To: blam
blam,
I am amazed at how you find all this fascinating material.
So...
Neanderthals buried their dead with flowers?
Made detailed or intricate tools?
Used skins and fur of animals for clothing in very cold climates?
Made glue?
But aren't they thought to have lacked the capacity for speech as we know it?
And how do we think this sophisticated information was conveyed and made part of the culture?
To: edwin hubble
aren't they thought to have lacked the capacity for speech as we know it? The men were silent, as befits someone trying to sneak up on large game animals and bash them with rocks. The women, though, mainly sat around the cook fire cooking and gossiping endlessly about the men.
51 posted on
12/02/2003 3:34:56 PM PST by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
To: edwin hubble
"But aren't they thought to have lacked the capacity for speech as we know it? " No, no, they could speak. A few years ago, a rarely surviving bone that is required for speech was found with a Neanderthal skull. (They were believed not to have this small bone)
65 posted on
12/02/2003 4:22:36 PM PST by
blam
To: edwin hubble
But aren't they thought to have lacked the capacity for speech as we know it? Yes, larynx is too high to allow proper vowel formation. I guess the people who think they couldn't talk never heard a Bantu speak in clicks, a Basque shepherd 'talk' to a friend on the next mountain with whistles, or seen anyone sign...
80 posted on
12/02/2003 4:54:59 PM PST by
null and void
(Even sheep have their limits.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson