Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zon
Uh, in your case, try self appointed. No offense but there's a big difference between you and the other gentlemen you mentioned.
276 posted on 01/05/2002 10:39:48 AM PST by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]


To: KantianBurke
Uh, in your case, try self appointed. No offense but there's a big difference between you and the other gentlemen you mentioned.

Not really, Jim And W. took upon themselves to do it their way. The biggest difference that I see is that I will not advocate or support the initiation of force, fraud or coercion against any person.

The best way to ensure that individual rights are protected is to have a constitution or law and courts based on the following:

Principle One: No person, group of persons, or government may initiate force, threat of force, or fraud against any individual.

Principle Two: Force may be morally and legally used only in self-defense against those who violate Principle One.

Principle Three: No exceptions shall be allowed for Principle One and Two.  

Principle One is first a law. For every instance that a person has force initiated against them there is a loss to that person. Only the person/victim knows the true value of their loss. The law underlying Principle One is as true as physics law.

285 posted on 01/05/2002 10:58:37 AM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson