Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CholeraJoe
The Western medical profession traditionally does not rely upon Chinese studies - especially ones which have not been replicated - especially when so many Wstern studies contradict the Chinese results.
23 posted on 01/04/2002 7:58:31 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Notwithstanding
The Western medical profession traditionally does not rely upon Chinese studies

Are you a member of the Western medical profession? I am and do not agree.

Please post a similar study from a medical journal that supports your position.

25 posted on 01/04/2002 8:01:47 AM PST by CholeraJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Notwithstanding
Here's one from the US:

The risk of breast cancer following spontaneous or induced abortion.

Wingo PA - Cancer Causes Control - 01-Jan-1997; 8(1): 93-108
From NIH/NLM MEDLINE

NLM Citation ID:
9051328 (PubMed}
97203756 (MEDLINE)

Comment:
Erratum In:

Full Source Title:
Cancer Causes and Control

Publication Type:
Journal Article; Review; Review, Tutorial

Language:
English

Author Affiliation:
Epidemiology and Surveillance Research Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30329-4251, USA.

Authors:
Wingo PA; Newsome K; Marks JS; Calle EE; Parker SL

Number of References:
96

Abstract:
To evaluate the relationship between breast cancer risk and spontaneous and induced abortion, we conducted a detailed descriptive review of 32 epidemiologic studies that provided data by type of abortion and by various measures of exposure to abortion-number of abortions, timing of abortion in relation to first full-term pregnancy, length of gestation, and age at first abortion. Breast cancer risk did not appear to be associated with an increasing number of spontaneous or induced abortions. Our review also suggested that breast cancer risk probably was not related to the other measures of exposure to abortion, and probably did not differ by age or a family history of breast cancer. Finally, the data appeared to suggest a slightly increased risk among nulliparous women, but this tendency was based primarily on studies with a small number of nulliparous women who had had spontaneous or induced abortions. Definitive conclusions about an association between breast cancer risk and spontaneous or induced abortion are not possible at present because of inconsistent findings across studies. Future investigations should consider prospective designs, separate analyses of spontaneous and induced abortions, appropriate referent groups, and adequate adjustment for confounding and effect modification. Future investigations also should attempt to determine whether any increased risks reflect the transient increase in breast cancer risk hypothesized for full-term pregnancy or a causal relationship specific to spontaneous or induced abortion.

28 posted on 01/04/2002 8:08:08 AM PST by CholeraJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson