I haven't engaged in personal attacks. I asked you to refrain from doing so as well.
Now, you say that you intend to use " brass knuckles " . Metaphorically , or not, that is NOT to be tolerated here; re the posted rules for replying .
Completely off topic, but WHY are you so invested in Keyes, that you are ready to cravenly debase those who find his anti-BUSH behavior offensive ? There is NO way that he will be the GOP's presidential candidate , in 2004. I'd be rather surprised , IF he jumped ship completely and tried to run as a fringe candidate. It does NOT harm me, if some people , here, rail against President Bush. It does NOT harm you, when others rail against Keyes. It harms ALL of us, when such devisiveness is allowed to grow and fester.
Use facts, and NOT " feelings ", to refute posts. PLEASE ?
While Keyes was my first choice last year, and my 2nd in 1996 (Gramm was my first choice) I do not believe that I am particularly invested in him. I do respect him as a political and philosophical leader. Those internet questionnaires of what candidates you were closer to actually showed me agreeing slightly more with Bush than Keyes.
But I oppose Evil, and the thug-summoning email of Howlin, to you and others, which I cited above is pure evil. It was the FR equivalent of a gang rape, and I like to think that I would fight against that sort of thing wherever I encounter it.
This whole thread is off-topic, nopardons.
The thread is about a Keyes TV show.
By the way,
"Anti-Bush" is an insult.
Especially the way you use it.
Keyes is not against Bush.
I'm not against Bush.
We are both against the policies of Bush.
We are not "enemies" of the country.
We are citizen's watching with skepticism
the actions of our government.
That is our duty.
You considered it your duty too,
in the fight to stop Clinton's violations.
You weren't an "enemy of our nation's leader."
You were a citizen trying to stop observed violations
perpetrated by our nation's President.