[Miss Marple]

How about "restoring honor and decency to the White House," which he has done. He did NOT campaign on a pledge to prosecute the Clintons. You will not find that anywhere in his campaign speeches or writings. He wanted to remove the poison of the Clinton years from the public discourse.

Now, you can disagree with him about whether or not he should prosecute (I go back and forth sometimes about this myself) but he never said he would do so.

[VRWC For Truth]

Klinton has already been prosecuted by the House for "high crimes and misdemeanors". The Sinate (judges) threw out the case. The problem is not Bush, it's the SINATE. The news media would always come to the defense of the Klintons so why would anyone fight a loosing battle. Pick your fights wisely, and be prepared. The Keyesters haven't learnt this yet, LOL

[exodus]

To: carenot
How about "restoring honor and decency to the White House," which he has done.
He did NOT campaign on a pledge to prosecute the Clintons.
You will not find that anywhere in his campaign speeches or writings.
He wanted to remove the poison of the Clinton years from the public discourse.

Now, you can disagree with him about whether or not he should prosecute
(I go back and forth sometimes about this myself)
but he never said he would do so.
# 430 by Miss Marple
************************

"he never said he would do so"
is the reason that I didn't support him
in the Republican primaries.

"he never said he would do so"
is the reason that I didn't vote for him
in the general election.

He didn't investigate
the treasonous activities
of the Clinton administration,
which is why I consider him
to be nothing but a politician,
with no principles
that extend past the next vote.

He's no better than Clinton.
They're two of a kind.