Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
Wasn't there some rule versus law chit chat going on? I didn't really focus on it, and am not sure what it means. But if Congress passes a law that says that Bush must spill his guts, unless executive privilege is in play, I suspect that he must. Of course, in times of national emergency, sometimes the executive says screw the law, at least his actions reflect that. Lincoln did it with habeas corpus. The check for that case is impeachment. If there is no constituency for that, then the executive holds the trump cards.
154 posted on 01/03/2002 7:55:20 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: Torie; Southern Federalist
Good Lord! Two of my very favorite posters on the same thread.

What a way to start a New Year!

157 posted on 01/03/2002 8:53:18 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

To: Torie
Of course, in times of national emergency, sometimes the executive says screw the law, at least his actions reflect that.

If GW is using the "War on Terrorism" as an excuse to do whatever he wants, then we are in trouble. The "War on Terrorism" will be like the "War on Drugs"-- it will never end.

Are we going to let the president usurp the government every time an embassy gets attacked somewhere ?

I think the Chief law enforcement officer in the land is setting a bad example by picking and choosing which laws\rules he wants to follow.

165 posted on 01/04/2002 5:55:32 AM PST by 74dodgedart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson