Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: garbanzo
I've just asked for good evidence, not proof, that his views differ substantially from those espoused by the KKK.

I dont actually know what the exact views the KKK has or what exactly they want myself and I bet alot of other people dont either. So instead of asking others to prove a negative why dont you back up and define you assertions about Buchanan and racism. Why is that so hard to expect on this subject?

766 posted on 01/02/2002 3:16:20 PM PST by PuNcH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 755 | View Replies ]


To: PuNcH
Why is that so hard to expect on this subject?

It's hard to expect because garbanzo and his ilk want to race bait and slime.

Defining terms and not asking people to prove a negative are elements of an HONEST debate, something with which this guy is definitely not familiar.

771 posted on 01/02/2002 3:24:07 PM PST by Blade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 766 | View Replies ]

To: PuNcH
Oh please - let's not play idiot here. If you didn't fall asleep in history class you know what the KKK stood for and stands for.
773 posted on 01/02/2002 3:27:07 PM PST by garbanzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 766 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson