Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RnMomof7
You folks should have been defending it too..not leaving it to a token Protestant. That never was a "doctrinal" "issue

I didn't see it. Sorry.

Now about the victim stuff--I don't ask anything of you except you treat me with a modicum of decency. If Catholics come on your threads and start trashing without debating then why wouldn't you report them? If they have nothing to add to the debate except telling us we're having a spiritual fornication, then what are they doing here? Not once did he try and tackle the content of the post.

I'm sorry, but I don't ever talk to you or any other protestant like what was said to me. I treat people like I want to be treated. What is wrong with that?

308 posted on 01/03/2002 4:28:37 PM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]


To: JMJ333
Now about the victim stuff--I don't ask anything of you except you treat me with a modicum of decency. If Catholics come on your threads and start trashing without debating then why wouldn't you report them? If they have nothing to add to the debate except telling us we're having a spiritual fornication, then what are they doing here? Not once did he try and tackle the content of the post.

We are grown ups that believe in free speech and feedom of expression even if the rest of FR has moved into the PC censorship column. We love our faiths and love discussing....come over and debate wear your self out..warning ya might get called a heretic but as my Catholic Grandmother used to say "sticks and stones..." I said NOTHING to you I never posted to you ever untill a few minutes ago I do not believe. When the day comes that the rest of FR is like you most of us will leave..then you can discuss the pope among yourselves as much as you like with great consensus but somehow I think that would be your loss and FR's loss...what good is anthing without a little salt?

309 posted on 01/03/2002 4:41:34 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

To: JMJ333
Not once did he try and tackle the content of the post.

Wrong! I did. You have already read the message #298 which addresses that I was arguing why I used the Biblical language that I did.

317 posted on 01/03/2002 5:03:19 PM PST by CCWoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson