Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jennyp
On another thread I voice my opinion on government supported art. The taxpayers should not pay for the support of artist.

The same can be said about government support education. Why should a taxpayer of one area pay for the education expense of children in another area? This would include cross town, let alone from one state to another.

Pooling the money and then redistributing it (with various cuts being taken out along the way) only assures those in charge there will be no real accountability.

Most problems concerning education could be solved if the financial responsibility for education was returned to the local area (where the accountability would follow).

The local School District would collect the money, hire the teachers, buy the books, maintain the schools and set the curricular. If they were not able to educate little Johnny, or were attempting to teach things the parents did not want taught in the schools they would be voted out of office.

As it is now, everyone points to someone else as the cause, or the reason they do what they do. Who do you fire?

Anyway that is what I think -

3 posted on 12/31/2001 1:33:40 PM PST by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CIB-173RDABN
You probably also think that the Constitution has something to do with governance in this country.
23 posted on 01/06/2002 11:33:01 AM PST by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson