It isn't "my view" that India owns Pakistan. Re-read the post. The Pakistani people were given the "right" to their own nation, it is the Kashmir that is in dispute, which was ruled at the time (1947)by a Hindu prince who wished to avoid joining India or Pakistan. The division that took place in 1947 did not include the Kashmir, which was part of India at the time. (If you don't like the "unusualness" of that, or understand it, what is that to me? It is the truth.)
I do agree that world war would not be a good thing, but since the world is ruled by chaos, confusion, and ignorance, it might happen.
Are you going to answer my question? I'll ask again. Why are you ignorantly trying to stir up anti-hinduism feeling among Christians at FR?
Your revisionist history of Kashmir is, uh, shall we say partisan. If a referendum were held today, no one can doubt that Kashmir would join up with Pakistan. Why would a predominantly Muslim country want to be ruled by a Hindu-fascist regime?
Which brings me to the answer to your question: Hinduism per se I could care less about. But the fundamentalist version of it being promulgated by the ruling BJP of India is dangerous. That's what the nuke scare is all about.