Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alien2
By your rationale, the medical community shouldn’t be using cadavers to teach med students what they need to know in order to perform skilled surgery, because cadavers were once human beings.

I'm sure I couldn't support everything GW does, but on the issue you raised, I didn't have a problem with his decision. One, because the embryo is already dead and Two, because the issue gave him the ability to draw a line in the sand with regard to the government's sanctioning via money for research, i.e. no money towards producing embryos for the purpose of killing them for research.

Not only does the president have to muster the moral conscience of America from the brainwashing of the nineties, but he must also muster the political clout to remain in office to do it. The way he handled this situation did both in my opinion.

50 posted on 12/29/2001 12:11:17 AM PST by Godfollow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Godfollow; Dr. Good Will Hunting
the medical community shouldn’t be using cadavers

Poor comparison. I dissected cadavers in med school.

I never experimented on the living tissues of human's created only in order to be destroyed, to harvest their living tissues. No one in cadaver lab was dissecting a body conceived and grown only to be dissected.

To cause a human life to begin only to be used for science/profit is a crime that cries out to God for vengence, alongside all the others of the last century.

How much longer Lord?

--Dr. Kopp

52 posted on 12/29/2001 12:12:36 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Godfollow
One, because the embryo is already dead and Two, because the issue gave him the ability to draw a line in the sand with regard to the government's sanctioning via money for research, i.e. no money towards producing embryos for the purpose of killing them for research.

Please illustrate this "line in the sand." There is none.

A pro-life leader would be championing the ban on fetal stem cell research even by the private sector. Banning fed funding knowing damn well the real problem lies with the private sector is a cowards way of trying to look pro-life.

I have held my tongue on FSCR up till now. I couldn't quite put my finger on what it was about Bush's decision that was unsettling. Now, after 9/11/01, it all stands out in bass relief.

Why should God Bless America, as we create human beings purely for destrucxtion and profit?

Why should God Bless America, as we kill the child in the womb?

Why should God Bless America, as we tolerate the advance of the homosexual agenda?

Why should God Bless America, as we ignore the roots of it all, the grave sin of contraception (especially abortifacient contraception, including the pill and all other hormonal contraceptives)?

God will not Bless America, when we pray for Blessing with our mouth while murdering the innocents with out hands and our votes.

9/11/01 was a warning. No one is heading it.

Worse shall come.

54 posted on 12/29/2001 12:12:45 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson