[Frances_Marion]

"Uh huh, I'm suuure you could, bubala. It's funny how the response to this column by the Amen Corner validates the column's theme: that, when faced with facts, the Ameners always turn to censorship (or, in this case, attempted censorship). Good god, even someone who denounces anti-Semitism, as I do above, isn't safe from these tribalist fanatics."

Noone is attempting to censor you, at least not me. I think you're being hyperbolic with the word 'censorship'. And your assertion that FOX said that Israel knew about the WTC attacks it untrue, I read your "article" and the corresponding Fox source, and Fox asserts that Israel knew something was coming, but didn't know the specifics....your insinuation that Israel was spying on us also isn't corroborated by FOX...they were spying on foreign nationals in the U.S. (Arabic nationals).

[Justin Raimondo]

You are just plain wrong. In the first report, Cameron says that while there is no evidence of Israeli involvement in the actual bombing,

"But investigators suspect that they Israelis may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance, and not shared it. A highly placed investigator said there are 'tie-ins.' But when asked for details, he flatly refused to describe them, saying, 'evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information.'"

That is pretty damned incriminating. And clearly Cameron's sources are from law enforcement officers close to the 9/11 investigation. So spin that one, buddy....