Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

STRANGE SYMBIOSIS – ISRAEL & ANTI-SEMITISM
Antiwar.com ^ | December 28, 2001 | Justin Raimondo

Posted on 12/29/2001 12:08:08 AM PST by H.R. Gross

Behind the Headlines
by Justin Raimondo
Antiwar.com

December 28, 2001

STRANGE SYMBIOSIS – ISRAEL & ANTI-SEMITISM
That 'sh*tty little country' is dangerous – to its allies, and to Jews everywhere

As Israel prepares to expel its Arab helots from Palestine, its "amen corner" worldwide is also on the march, excoriating anyone who looks cross-eyed at Ariel Sharon as an "anti-Semite." The latest front in this campaign is England, where Barbara Amiel, wife of media magnate Conrad Black, went on a rampage in the Telegraph, claiming that, at a recent dinner party, the French ambassador referred to Israel as "that sh*tty little country," and wondered why the world had to be dragged to the edge of World War III on account of it. On the basis of evidence gleaned at ritzy cocktail parties, says Ms. Amiel, the world is experiencing a revival of anti-Semitism, which is now "respectable" again.

OSAMA ON MTV?

Oh, please! Does she really expect us to believe that Osama's infamous videos denouncing the "Jews and Crusaders" are the "in" thing with the hip cognoscenti? Lay off the crack pipe, lady, and get real: anti-Semitism is less respectable than pedophilia. After all, hordes of people aren't buying The Protocols of the Elder of Zion the way they're snatching up those Abercrombie & Fitch catalogs, now are they? Amiel's essay is just one breathtaking inversion of reality after another. Getta load-a this:

"For the past 25 years, I've watched sad-faced Israeli activists trudge around Western capitals with heavy hearts beating under ill-fitting suits. They carry folders of transcripts and videotapes to document the misrepresentations in the press and the moral hypocrisy of the world towards Israel. They want to win the war of ideas on its merits. Their attention to detail in translating the hate literature of the Middle East and the hate-filled speeches of its leaders is commendable."

FOLLOW THE MONEY

One can only wonder what "Western capitals" she means: surely not Washington, D.C. Everyone acknowledges that the Israel lobby is among the most powerful in the Imperial City. How else have they managed to get their hands on a grand total of $90 billion-plus in American military and economic aid since Israel's inception?

A STRANGE IRONY

Aside from US exporters, Israel is the single largest beneficiary of our "foreign aid" program: US tax dollars paid for a booby-trap bomb planted near an Arab elementary school, which blasted a group of Palestinian children – children! – to bits. American tax dollars also pay for Israeli "settlements" inhabited by violent, fanatical fundamentalists intent on provoking war no matter what. This image of sad bedraggled little underdogs making their rounds, desperately fighting an uphill battle against overwhelming odds, is nothing but a bad joke – either that, or it is meant to be ironic.

I SHOULD BE SO POWERLESS

If the Israeli lobby is so powerless, then why this American largesse? We not only arm Israel, but we also prop up their sh*tty little socialist economy with constant infusions of cash. Whatever those Israeli "activists" are carrying around in their folders, whatever is on those videotapes, it must be some pretty powerful stuff. Given the Fox News revelations about the extent of Israeli spying in the US, I don't even want to hazard a guess as to what's in them.

THE ONEIDA PURGE

They want to "win the war of ideas on its merits"? Tell that to Jean Ryan, former managing editor of the Oneida (NY) Daily Dispatch, and city editor Dale Seth (a 15-year veteran of the paper), who were both fired when a delegation of Israel Firsters approached the editor and then the owner demanding the paper retract an allegedly "anti-Semitic" post-9/11 editorial written by Seth. Seth's crime was to recall the terrorist origins of the Jewish state – as if no one had ever heard of the Irgun and the Stern Gang, both of which waged war on the Arab civilian population – and without which the state of Israel would never have come into existence. He also made the true but politically incorrect observation that the whole region is rife with religious fanaticism, and Israel is no exception to the rule:

"The United States, through its close association with Israel since its inception, has now been dragged kicking and screaming right into the middle of that centuries-old Middle Eastern conflict. From that position, it would behoove that party in the middle to consider the hearts of the warring parties. Neither can be simply beat into submission."

UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER

A local attorney, Randy Schaal, demanded a meeting with Ryan to protest the editorial: Ryan refused to meet with him, pointing out that that if the staff met with everyone who disagreed with an editorial, they would never get a paper out. She told him to write a letter to the editor, which he did. But Schaal also contacted local politicians, as well as the Anti-Defamation League, and it wasn't long before pressure was brought to bear on the paper's management, which then ordered its editors to come up with a "clarification." This was published alongside Schaal's letter, a letter from Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY), and a missive from the mayor of Oneida. Still, Schaal and his fellow Ameners weren't satisfied. They went to the President of the Journal Register Co., and demanded a retraction and an apology: it was unconditional surrender, or nothing.

GROVELING TOWARD BETHLEHEM

After a series of meetings with various self-appointed representatives of the Jewish community, the owners of the Daily Dispatch caved and published a groveling mea culpa: "We understand many felt [the editorial] expressed anti-Semitic sentiments," it said. "We will not further offend our readers by attempting in any way to justify what was written; we can only assure readers that The Dispatch is not anti-Semitic and that we acknowledge the editorial should not have been published."

So much for the Israeli lobby winning the war of ideas on the "merits" of their case. Clearly, another strategy is at work here: not debating their opponents but silencing them.

ODE TO BRUTE FORCE

The rest of Amiel's essay is really a kind of paean to the efficacy of brute force. While those poor bedraggled Israeli "activists" may have been fighting an uphill battle, according to Amiel, in the post-9/11 era the tide seems to be turning, and she can hardly keep herself from gloating that now the Arabs are really going to get it:

"Powerful as the truth may be, it needs a nudge from 16,000lb daisy cutter bombs once in a while. The Arab/Muslim world's intransigence comes into sharper focus when we see the Americans liberate Afghanistan from the Taliban in six weeks and a cornered Arafat unable to go to the bathroom without the risk of being blown into the next world."

PSYCHOPATHIA SEXUALIS

Here is the kind of Zionist who clearly enjoys the brutality and indignity of the Israeli occupation. Such people now feel free to publicly exhibit and even flaunt their perversity, which seems like something straight out of Kraft-Ebbing. What else can one call Amiel's odd interest in controlling Arafat's bowel movements other than a sh*tty little perversion?

THE TERRORISTIC IMPERATIVE

"Nothing succeeds like powerful bombs," exults this war goddess, "as bin Laden explained in his latest video release. 'When people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature they will like the strong horse,' he said." How natural for her to approvingly cite bin Laden on the terroristic imperative: but then that is what tribal warfare is all about, no matter which side one fights on.

CHOO-CHOO

Yes, it is force, not reason or negotiation, that is decisive, avers Ms. Amiel, who gleefully predicts that "All those people badmouthing the Jews and Israel will quieten down." Or else be quieted down, involuntarily, like Jean Ryan, Dale Seth, and now perhaps Carl Cameron, of Fox News. "You are looking," Amiel continues, "at the tail end of the train but the engine has already turned a corner and is going in the opposite direction" – and anyone who shows up at one of those ritzy parties she's always attending had better get on board, or else.

AMIEL'S JIHAD

No one would think to label denunciations of, say, Robert Mugabe, as the equivalent of anti-black racism: but we are expected to just accept that virtually all criticism of Israel and Ariel Sharon is due to "anti-Semitism." Amiel's blatantly dishonest and self-serving jihad is naturally bound to cause resentment among all thinking people – an emotion that could, easily, turn into genuine anti-Semitism. But that, I believe, is the point: anti-Semitism serves the interests of the most extreme wing of the Zionist movement, and always has.

100 YEARS AFTER DREYFUSS

Founded as it is on the permanence of Jewish victimology, and the idea that anti-Semitism is inevitable, Zionism thrives when Jewish persecution grows. It is a natural tendency of Zionist propaganda to exaggerate hostility to Jews. The founder of Zionism, Theodore Herzl, was confirmed in his opinion that it was "futile" to combat anti-Semitism when the infamous Dreyfuss case was at the center of a storm of controversy. Today, however, with the rapid decline and marginalization of anti-Semitism everywhere but in the Middle East, the pressing need for a Jewish state requires more justification.

WHY A JEWISH STATE?

Anti-Semitism in the West, as "hate crime" statistics and other research has shown in recent years, is practically nonexistent. This good news was hailed by Jewish organizations in the US when it was first announced, but the extreme Zionists were no doubt made uneasy. For if anti-Jewish prejudice is distinctly beyond the pale, at least in the civilized world, i.e., the West, then what do we need a Jewish state for? This is a question many Jews, when faced with an appeal to emigrate to Israel, must ask themselves, and, at least up until Ms. Amiel's outburst, the Zionists have had no good answer. Now they appear to have solved the problem by simply redefining "anti-Semitism" to mean any criticism of Israel's expansionist policies and its current radical right-wing government.

THE OLD ANTI-SEMITISM

Anti-Semitism used to mean legal and cultural proscriptions directed against Jews. In medieval Europe, Jews were forced into ghettos, in Nazi Germany they were branded with the yellow star and exterminated, and, in America and Europe, it used to be that some establishments, both high and low, would not do business with Jews. Certain hotels and men's clubs would not admit them, and anti-Semitism was especially rife in the universities where an unofficial Jewish quota kept their numbers and influence limited. This is real anti-Semitism, and, today, it is not only illegal but socially and politically unacceptable: anyone deemed an anti-Semite in this, the original sense, is in effect a pariah, and rightly so.

Read the rest of the article



TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 1,021-1,037 next last
To: JMJ333
Sorry, but I don't believe that--nor do I believe in some global conspiracy.

Sorry, I missed that part. Get yourself some books written on the subject prior to 1950. Might shake your belief system a bit. The extent of revisionist junk that's been written in recent decades and is purported to be a factual history of those events is quite often the reverse of events as these authors/statesmen experienced them.

341 posted on 12/29/2001 12:15:35 AM PST by Ridin' Shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Justin Raimondo
As for #9: you obviously haven't read the stories about Israel now admitting it has nuclear weapons (I believe it was in the Telegraph) and even revealing how they were developed. To what purpose? Clearly, this is meant as a threat.
When you went to the gym before as you said, you developed your muscles.

To what purpose? Clearly, this was meant as a threat by you.

342 posted on 12/29/2001 12:15:36 AM PST by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: madrussian
For you I will use the old socialist phraseology. Objectively speaking you are on the side of the Islamics when it comes to the case of Israel. You are making common cause with them. You are unable to argue with me on this one. 

Your cutting off  US aid to Israel is the same bs the Muslims are promoting. Once again you cannot argue with this either!

343 posted on 12/29/2001 12:15:36 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

Comment #344 Removed by Moderator

To: The Documentary Lady
I see. I am not allowed to refer to your anti-semitism as such, but you are allowed to label me an Israei-Firster implying that I don't care about the interests of my country (the great USA), even though that is not true. Well, if that's what makes you feel good, enjoy.
345 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:08 AM PST by College Repub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: Hugh Akston
Israel has always denied having nuclear weapons: now, the whole story is forthcoming, and in the Telegraph no less (thanks, Conrad Black). This is clearly meant as a threat.
346 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:08 AM PST by Justin Raimondo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Justin Raimondo
They haven't denied it. They have just refused to admit to having them. Sortof a no-comment stance. And in any case, the rest of the world has known for decades that they DO have them, so this is a non-issue.
347 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:08 AM PST by College Repub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Justin Raimondo
If I had told people that I never owned a gun, because I did not want to risk someone breaking in and taking it, but then later changed my mind and decided to put a sticker on my window stating that I was a gun owner because I felt it might deter someone from breaking in, if I had that change in strategy, would me announcing that I own a gun be a threat?

Not buying it.

348 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:09 AM PST by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

Comment #349 Removed by Moderator

To: dennisw
You are making common cause with them.

For that I would have to argue for the destruction of Israel. Your argument comes down to, if the islamics say that the sky is blue, I must say it's not blue, it's red.

Your cutting off US aid to Israel is the same bs the Muslims are promoting.

Aren't you, as an American patriot, supposed to support reduction or complete elimination of all American foreign aid, as a general principle?

And all analogies made by me and AGAviator still stand. You aren't able to argue with that!

350 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:09 AM PST by madrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: The Documentary Lady
Amusing hearing an Islam firster such as you accusing an American of being Israel first. Support of Israel is good thing. Zionism is fantastic. People like you have been whining ever since Jews made a homeland in Israel.
Arabs have been whining too despite the many Arab nations they have.

Israel is a great idea because with a nation you can arm yourself and defend yourself. Far better than being a guest in the nation of others.

351 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:09 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: all
The thread has degenerated into the usual low-intensity "conflict", with one side successfully moving the focus away from the main topic, into the usual game of accusations and rebuttals.

One more thread is saved from anti-semites, LOL!

352 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:09 AM PST by madrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: madrussian; NixNatAVanG InDaBurgh
He who harms the least of us harms all of us...even if it be one of our own


353 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:09 AM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: madrussian
Aren't you, as an American patriot, supposed to support reduction or complete elimination of all American foreign aid, as a general principle?

NO WAY! I am for well targeted foreign aid. Such as military aid to Israel. I am not isolationist. I am for America first and Israel second. I don't know or care what AGAviator said.

354 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:10 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

Comment #355 Removed by Moderator

To: Askel5
Hey, thanks! I'd rather defer to the more knowledgable ones when it comes down to rebutting such a frontal attack!
356 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:10 AM PST by madrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies]

To: NixNatAVanG InDaBurgh
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A PALESTINIAN. There is an Egyptian,Arab butcher who fancies himself a leader of a pack of mongrel junkyard dogs. There are NO OCCUPIED TERRITORIES. The land belongs to Israel. The people who call it palestine do not belong there, are not from there, and should not be there.

You make your point well. Your posting is appropriate in relationship to the original article.

357 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:11 AM PST by Jack Barbara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
> Unless you believe in a fiend for a God, I can't see what it is about the birth of the state of Israel -- the Interested Parties among the globalists or the coercion, assasination, fear and intimidation of terrorists that screams: "God's will at work here!".

Askel5,
There has BEEN an Israel for over 5,000 years. It didn't just begin 50 years ago. It has always been promised that we would be gathered in from all over the world, the Diaspora, to return HOME. It was home. It is a place of the heart. The well. The lifeblood.
You can treat it as simply another place, but it is a womb just as surely as likened to any mother who has ever given birth to a child. Go to any of the Sacred Grounds of any Native Nation and you will find a reverence beyond understanding. They also expect fulfilment of their promise one day. Just as you await a Second Coming, we await the FIRST, and that place where we were admonished to wait is Jerusalem, Israel. It is the only place in Judaism considered the Holy of Holies. Maybe you don't understand the importance in Jewish Culture of the Moshiach. It is the reason for our existence. That belief is our common bond with all of humanity. LIFE, not eternal death or eternal condemnation.
And so we wait. And never. NEVER, will we relinquish Jerusalem again. Our Rebbes speak more and more often of the Coming of the Moshiach. On that day, we will be there. What politicians do or don't do will make no difference. No man will hold sway over another. We WAIT, Askel5. It has nothing to do with politics or what other people think or believe. It's what we have been taught all of our lives. Each generation prays to be THE generation that sees eternal peace on earth. But G-d did not promise us a rose garden. No one ever said the way would be easy. But we go on.

358 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:11 AM PST by NixNatAVanG InDaBurgh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: madrussian
JDL has always been better than ADL. JDL goes way back to when they used to harrass the Russian UN mission to the UN. JDL is more of a "street" outfit with not much funding. Prolly more than a few right wingers in JDL while ADL is a liberal organization.

ADL is far bigger and better financed.

359 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:11 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Is this the SM thread?? I believe I am seeing anti-semitic sadists dishing it out, and Jewish masochists happily receiving the abuse. No wonder Raimondo is here, it's right up his sexual alley.

Go for it, give and receive.

360 posted on 12/29/2001 12:16:12 AM PST by imperator2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 1,021-1,037 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson