To: SentryoverAmerica
I personally know many women, . . .who vote with the RATS because the Republicans get tangled up on this issue. This is what we folks in the statistical analysis business call 'anecdotal evidence'. It is unscientific, and proves nothing whatsoever. It barely qualifies as a data item.
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
This is what we folks in the statistical analysis business call 'anecdotal evidence'. It is unscientific, and proves nothing whatsoever. It barely qualifies as a data item.Bernard Goldberg recently used the example of the women who stated that Nixon couldn't have won because everyone she knows voted for McGovern. We are seeing a lot of this logic on this thread.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson