Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OWK
He wasn't left free to pursue a LIFE of anything.

So isn't it a shame that they ignored his inability to give consent (due to age) and gave him a quick and somewhat disappointing coupling with a 'sex worker' as his only understanding of what love and sex are all about? Wouldn't you be disappointed if that was all you knew about it?

Putting the moral aspects aside for a moment, I don't think it would have been possible for him to have a meaningful experience given his age, maturity, and situation. By attempting to give him what they may have considered was the next best thing, they did him a disservice.

The adults should have known better.

271 posted on 12/21/2001 3:18:49 PM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]


To: FormerLib
My comments on the subject are in post 95.
274 posted on 12/21/2001 3:21:16 PM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson