I guess they didn't think it was too bad ..... BTW .... you can get 30-06 AP at the gun shows .... very nice round :)
"I have noticed that many times when you (like Poohbah) do not agree with someone's information (basis) or opinion you ignore it, pretend it does not exist and claim no basis was provided."
It seems to me that katze's reply to Uncle Bill (Uncle Bill reply #113) in reply #115 is another proof that what I wrote about katze in reply #109 is correct. He and Poohbah are in self deluded denial (opinion!):
To: Uncle Bill
Hey, UB. More canned, repetitive posts? You can have this fake, he's all yours, OPINION and all. If you're gonna rag on anyone, it should be Clinton--this is Bush territory.
115 posted on 12/26/01 6:28 PM Pacific by katze
It also seems that katze and Poohbah just can't stand it when someone writes that their boy, former President Bush is a traitor, even when Uncle Bill and I also have pointed out numerous times that CLinton was a traitor too. Katze and Poohbah just blindly want to limit the discussion to CLinton and not Clinton and Bush and they pretend we are being unfair because we will not play their deluded game of only talking about Clinton.
The fact is Uncle Bill and I are both Americans first and we do not have blind, mind numbed loyalties to either parties. We look at issues and facts and form our opinions independent of party spin doctors trying to tell us how to think.
I also wrote in reply #107:
"I am not running for office, I am not writing a book and I am not in a court of law. I did not write an article for publication or even an official editorial. I freely give out my opinion at coffee shops and barber shops and even on the FreeRepublic-imagine that! And I hear others giving out opinions similar to mine at all the same places."
Yet in reply #109 Poobah still is whining since he just doen't want to understand that a reply on FR is reserved for opinions (unless an article written by the replier is a reposted as the reply)and that articles and editorials are posted for presenting verifiable information as such on the FR:
"First you said in Post #19 that Bush DID commit treason. You didn't use the weasel-words "in my opinion," like you did here--you just stated it as bald fact. Fast forward to Post #107, and now you're waffling and saying that it's just your opinion. You obviously decided to go with the lesser of two weasels on this issue."
I guess we are going to have to hold Poobah's poor little hand to gently guide him into understanding things obvious to other people, namely that replies are opinions. Maybe Poohbah is confused when he reads someone write about firmly held opinions since he seems so accustomed in dealing with Clinton who never had a firmly held belief or opinon (except not to have a belief or opinion-everything was relative to his expediency for the moment).
Poobah's and katze's hero and sterling example, Bush Sr, waffled and weaseled on "no new taxes" and abortion , so maybe they need to go back to the drawing board since they are so confused about the difference between opinions and lying by Bush Sr. on taxes and abortion.
Here is another jewel of behavior (rules on FR cover this but are only selectively enforced) from irish_lad in relply #119 :
To: OKCSubmariner
You are a dumb ass.
119 posted on 12/26/01 6:43 PM Pacific by irish_lad
Why is it that I get the feeling Poohbah is praising irish_lad for his bad behavior in this reply by Poohbah?:
To: irish_lad
Don't hold back...let us know what you REALLY think :o)
121 posted on 12/26/01 6:44 PM Pacific by Poohbah
Seems to me that irish_lad deserves to be on your team, Poobah and katze. Irish_lad seems to be on your quality level and in your league. But you may no longer want irish_lad on your team since in your estimation (praise for him by Poohbah in reply #121?) the quality of his replies may actually exceed the quality of your replies.