Replies

And so I'm asking YOU (who have made the link) how you can suggest that a designer is requisite to explain the complexity of life, but that the even greater complexity of the designer himself, doesn't require a designer?

What is your explanation?

I understand your point. You're saying that if complexity implies a designer, why doesn't the designer of the complexity have a designer?

And I'm saying, maybe he does, if as you say he's necessarily "complex" (although I'd like to know how you know).

But the real issue is the link between complexity and design. Is the kind of complexity we find in life evidence (not necessarily proof) of design or not? And you're the guy who's dodging that issue, buddy. Capisci?

You're saying that if complexity implies a designer, why doesn't the designer of the complexity have a designer? And I'm saying, maybe he does...

And in saying "maybe he does", you create a cosmic hall of mirrors of infinite scope and proportion.

An endless string of continuously designing designers, each with a great complexity than his creation.

Welcome... to the Twighlight Zone.