Interesting way to look at things. If science doesn't explain absolutely everything to your satisfaction, you seem to reject it all, entirely. On the other hand, divinities are unsupported by evidence and they explain nothing at all; yet you claim that they give you the answers to everything.
No, that's not at all what I said, as you well know. Nor do I "reject all science, entirely."
On the other hand, divinities are unsupported by evidence and they explain nothing at all;
Oh, my. That's a completely insupportable statement.
yet you claim that they give you the answers to everything.
Nor do I make that claim.
I make that two gross mischaracterizations and one insupportable statement. Not a single useful thing in that post. Perhaps you should try again.
Unsupported by evidence? I could think of a few things...
It is interesting ot note that some dismiss divinity on one ground, namely, where did God come from? Is this not akin to your charge of dismissing all science becuase of one or two (though in actuallity one could find an almost unlimited supply of inprovable things sciecne will never be able to definately answer) unanswerable questions? You likely diagree, so please explain how the two differ so dramaticaly.