Replies

If you read "What is Creation Science" by Dr. Morris, he will not quote one scripture to you and shoot holes in several Darwin myths. None of these scientist are quoting scripture, they are just pointing out barriers they have encountered trying to explain the unexplainable, aka evolution. Most of the evidence creationists have is proving that evoluton is impossible and the evolutionist keeps adjusting their "religion" to explain away problems exposed by other scientists. If creationists can get a fair hearing, they always win the argument. That is where the vitriol of evolutionists come in. They say all we can do is quote scripture, and we say all you can do is call people morons. Well, more and more of these "morons" have PHD's in science and have won Nobel Prizes for their work. It is getting more difficult to relegate these people to mere "Bible thumpers".

"Most of the evidence creationists have is proving that evoluton is impossible and the evolutionist keeps adjusting their "religion" to explain away problems exposed by other scientists."

Evolutionists cannot make their case. They advocate teaching scientific "fact" in schools but never point out to students that evolution is a theory. No one can go back in time to confirm their ideas of how life came to be so they are relying on "faith" every bit as much as they accuse creationists of doing. It would be laughable if it wasn't so pathetically sad. Any person with half a brain (evolved or not) can see that if evolution has indeed been occuring for billions of years, you couldn't dig a hole for an outhouse without unearthing thousands of fossils, transitionary or otherwise. Until they can tell us why the Missing Link is, well, missing, it's hard to take these debates seriously.

Most of the evidence creationists have is proving that evoluton is impossible and the evolutionist keeps adjusting their "religion" to explain away problems exposed by other scientists.

Yes, the theory of evolution is constantly `evolving', so to speak. That is the nature a theory based on current scientific knowledge (which is imperfect), as opposed to ``revealed truth'' (aka blind faith).

If creationists can get a fair hearing, they always win the argument.

In the future I would reading something other than Charisma News and Jack Chick Comics if you want to get an indicator on the current state of scientific debate.