[Moby Grape]

You should be alarmed by the threat of chemical or nuclear attack. It would be the treasonous to handcuff our government, and thereby, allow savages such as bin Laden to continue attacks on innocent Americans.

[scottiewottie]

You should be alarmed by the failure of our government to warn, prepare, or respond to a plane hijacking much less a chemical or nuclear attack. I would be treasonous to lavish government with more control of our lives when it fails to accomplish even the simplest of tasks that liberals, conservatives, progressives, democrats, communists, republicans, libertarians and greens see as fundamental; destroy our enemies now and prevent, warn, and prepare us for attacks in the future.

[Alan Chapman]

It would be the treasonous to handcuff our government, and thereby, allow savages such as bin Laden to continue attacks on innocent Americans.

Ya, our government should continue giving hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign-aid and billions in military hardware to Afghanistan like they've been doing for the last 20 years. Then when they use it to commit atrocities against their own people and people in other countries we should expand our own government and pass thousands of new laws and subjugate ourselves to further government surveillance to deal with the situation.

[Tauzero]

"You should be alarmed by the threat of chemical or nuclear attack."

Slightly concerned.

The risk to a typical person in the United States from terrorism is miniscule.