Skip to comments.
DENVER VS. THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
Stanley for U.S. Senate Campaign ^
| December 15, 2001 - Bill of Rights Day
| N/A
Posted on 12/15/2001 6:23:07 PM PST by LibertyRocks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 481-500 next last
To: D Joyce
The most charitable thing I can attribute to you is, your a Twit. You are being WAY to kind ....
To: suijuris
National CCW is a doubled edged sword. If all the law states is that any state must honor a CCW issued by another state or the laws of that state which allow CCW just like a drivers license it's not a problem. One problem is Vermont which has no laws restricting CCW. I don't know how another state would handle that. Would a Vermont driver's license be sufficient?
If a national CCW law requires a federal agency to pass judgement on who is allowed CCW or maintain a database, that's a problem.
To: LIBERTARIAN JOE
Talk is cheap. The LP is nothing but talk.
283
posted on
12/16/2001 1:53:17 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: MississippiMan
Your story expresses a natural consequence of our socialist state. In the past no one would question your right to allow whomever into your store. Now that you work for the public good however patrons expect to be able to do whatever they please on your supposed private property.
But, in this case in order to challenge the law you must be charged. So this was a necessary act. Most gun haters will not be persuaded by logic anyway.
To: LibertyRocks
I advocate absolute adherence to the 2nd Amendment by any of our many governments from local to national. My rights are given by God and not by a piece of paper, but those spelled out and affirmed by our Bill of Rights are absolute.
I even appreciate this Libertarian standing up for the 2nd Amendment. I'm not a Libertarian, and I have different interpretations and understandings for other areas such as the War on Terrorism, but on this issue, this man is right.
285
posted on
12/16/2001 2:07:26 PM PST
by
xzins
To: Roscoe
Talk is cheap. The LP is nothing but talk. You mean Rick Stanley was arrested today for cheap talking? Dang they got a law for everything these days.
To: takenoprisoner
Getting arrested is an accomplishment? Pathetic.
287
posted on
12/16/2001 2:14:14 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: BenR2
Spoken like a true (the state is my god) statist thug.
No skin off my boot if he ends up being arrested.
To: Roscoe
Getting arrested is an accomplishment? Pathetic. I believe it has been proven reliable tool for social change in the past. Care to challenge?
To: takenoprisoner
I believe it has been proven reliable tool Not in the hands on the LP. Can you come up with even one example?
290
posted on
12/16/2001 2:22:15 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: LibertyRocks
I remember one Denver law that is still in the books to this day. Something about not shooting at prairie dogs from the back window of a cable car with a 30-30. Rabbits - OK. Bus window - OK. 30.06 - OK. But apparently certain isolated circumstances are targeted for swift clampdown.
To: EricOKC
Here is where i will have to disagree with you. The AAA was one of the strongest lobbying groups attempting to RETAIN the 55MPH limit.
Do you just lie and make stuff up? Read this . This is the AAA spokesman talking about how happy they were that the power to set speed limits was going from the federal government back to the states.
"The swift actions of these legislators were bolstered by the support of motorist advocates. "We believe that the states will do as good a job, or even a better job, at setting and enforcing the limits," says Bill Jackman, a spokesman for the American Automobile Association. "In many states the federal limits were really disdained. . . . All of the state departments of transportation are responsible institutions with respectable people working in them. We trust them to do their jobs well." With 39 million members nationwide, AAA represents the interests of almost a quarter of all licensed drivers. "
To: EricOKC
Like it or not, D Joyce is correct.
After you just made that stuff up about AAA opposing the repeal of the federal 55 mph, you have no credibility to speak on anything.
To: VA Advogado
Aren't Libertarians entitled to invent facts?
294
posted on
12/16/2001 2:26:29 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Maelstrom
The law was changed because practically NOBODY obeyed the 55mph speed limit law.
There are lots of laws that are ingnored and not enforced. But for one to be repealed requires active lobbying.
To: Roscoe
Talk is cheap. --- The roscoes of this world spout nothing but cheap talk.
296
posted on
12/16/2001 2:28:14 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: tpaine
Talk is cheap. You said it.
297
posted on
12/16/2001 2:29:44 PM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Maelstrom
Re: Maritime Contract Court IT's obvious you have no idea what D. Joyce was talking about.
Is this like one of them there common law courts/trials where you good militia folks try and convict your local officals and then put liens on their property?
To: VA Advogado
Talk is cheap. --- The 'va advogados' of this world spout nothing but cheap talk.
BTW, - what is a 'va advogodo'?
299
posted on
12/16/2001 2:32:23 PM PST
by
tpaine
To: Roscoe
Aren't Libertarians entitled to invent facts?
For people who are always imploring others to read these documents, they have to be the most illiterate spongeheads I've ever met. If they didnt have such soft skulls surely they would hear echos as they typed.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 481-500 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson