Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ramius
". Do you release transcripts of your discussions with your attorney to the opposing counsel? Should Congressmen? Should the President? No."

I might be in a time warp or something, but weren't the records subpoenaed from "Clinton's Justice Dept"?

So how does it relate/rationalize that Bush covers for their Criminality?

84 posted on 12/13/2001 7:10:23 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: rdavis84
I might be in a time warp or something, but weren't the records subpoenaed from "Clinton's Justice Dept"? ... So how does it relate/rationalize that Bush covers for their Criminality?

I don't think that things approaching advice of counsel were subpoenaed, but I'm perfectly willing to be wrong about that. The important point, and thanks for making it clear, is that there is nothing about this that suggests that he is covering for himself or anyone else. It sounds to me like he doesn't want to talk about what plans they have. On the face of it, that's not inherently suspicious.

88 posted on 12/13/2001 7:16:45 AM PST by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson