To: Ramius
There is no way to defend this action. Every conservative deplored it when the Clintons did it. It's simply hypocritical to justify it when W does it.
44 posted on
12/13/2001 6:33:31 AM PST by
tjg
To: tjg
"It's simply hypocritical to justify it when W does it."
No. Then it's Masterful Politics. Haven't you been listening!!?? :-)
48 posted on
12/13/2001 6:37:50 AM PST by
rdavis84
To: tjg
There is no way to defend this actionOn one hand I agree that I want our Gov't to hand over its info so we can be informed on the other I want there to be a balance of power between the branches of our gov't. This requires the executive branch to draw a line in the sand and not roll every time congress makes a request.
To a certain extent I approved that Clinton fought off many attacks against his executive power even though he had selfish motives.
To: tjg
Update:
- Bush Invokes Executive Privilege (7:35 a.m. PST Dec. 13)
- WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush invoked executive privilege for the first time Thursday to keep Congress from seeing documents of prosecutors' decision-making in cases ranging from decades-old Boston murders to the Clinton-era fund-raising probe.
To: tjg
Oh the hypocrisy! Never again will I beleive this crap about Republicans loveing liberty. They CHEER one constitutional violation after the other. And if you dare question anything you are practically called a traitor.
To: tjg
Every conservative deplored it when the Clintons did it. It's simply hypocritical to justify it when W does it. Umm... nope, not quite the point. Do you release transcripts of your discussions with your attorney to the opposing counsel? Should Congressmen? Should the President? No.
78 posted on
12/13/2001 7:00:58 AM PST by
Ramius
To: tjg
"It is simply hypocritical to justify it when W does it." ......and pathetic to see it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson