Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exodus
"Do you believe that Bush will prosecute Clinton?"

"Or do you share my belief that Clinton will walk?"

I seem to remember Clinton being impeached, then being allowed to walk.

Must have been another one of those things that you did not have any knowledge of yesterday--like the fact that President Bush had instilled a National Emergency, that Congress had given him the go ahead to use force, that the War Powers Act is one of those legislations that Congress can pass--and that today you are an expert on, or that Bush has not been in office a year yet.

Facts do not seem to matter much to you.

I seem to lack two things that you posses; 1) A crystal ball, and 2) An axe to grind and an agenda to help the Democrats elect one of their own in 2004.

The friend of my enemy is my enemy.

229 posted on 12/13/2001 10:14:43 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez
"...What about Clinton, Luis?
Do you believe that Bush will prosecute Clinton?
Or do you share my belief that Clinton will walk?

# 200 by exodus

***********************

To: exodus
I seem to remember Clinton being impeached, then being allowed to walk.

Must have been another one of those things that you did not have any knowledge of yesterday--like the fact that President Bush had instilled a National Emergency, that Congress had given him the go ahead to use force, that the War Powers Act is one of those legislations that Congress can pass--and that today you are an expert on, or that Bush has not been in office a year yet.

Facts do not seem to matter much to you.

I seem to lack two things that you posses; 1) A crystal ball, and 2) An axe to grind and an agenda to help the Democrats elect one of their own in 2004.

The friend of my enemy is my enemy.
# 229 by Luis Gonzalez
********

"Friend of my enemy?"
Idiot.
Your biggest enemy is your un-informed mind.

For someone who insists on absolute accuracy, you sure do mess up a lot.
Apparently you didn't pay attention during the impeachment, Luis.

Impeachment by the House only accused the President of violating his office.
If the Senate had convicted Clinton of violating his office,
he would still be a free man, just no longer President.

The Senate "trial" was not a legal trial.
It was an attempt to remove Clinton from power
so that he would no longer have the protection of the office.
After conviction in the Senate,
Clinton would have been subject to criminal prosecution
by the Justice Department for his crimes against persons,
and for his crimes against the country.

Remember, Luis?
Everyone said,
"When Bush takes office, Clinton's going to pay!!"

It's been a year now, and Clinton's still a free man.

244 posted on 12/13/2001 10:48:39 AM PST by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson