[Jarhead_22]

Not to pass judgement or anything, but could it be that Linda Tripp is still unemployed because employers are reticent to hire someone who has illegally recorded private conversations, and then made those recordings public? A trust issue, perhaps?

[jungleboy]

Give me a break jarhead. Maybe she's too moral, and not corruptable.

[bvw]

That's defamation, sir. Her recordings were not illegal, and you are a pig for repeating this false accusation.

[bvw]

You are a cad and a liar, too: "Not to pass judgement or anything", is a bold lie of a disclaimer. For that evil is exactly what you are doing, and a spurious, medacious, false judgement at that.

[Arthur McGowan]

The word you want is "reluctant," not "reticent."

[Arthur McGowan]

The word in the U.S. is "judgment," not "judgement."

[Smedley]

Not to pass judgement or anything, but could it be that Linda Tripp is still unemployed because employers are reticent to hire someone who has illegally recorded private conversations, and then made those recordings public? A trust issue, perhaps?

I don't know -- seems Tripp had three choices. Tripp could lie to Starr, i.e., perjure herself; tell the truth and make a few recordings to verify her story; or tell the truth and face perjury charges brought by Whitehouse intent on destroying anyone who defied them.

In the same circumstances, I'd have done the same thing.

[gatex]

"...has illegally recorded private conversations, and then made those recordings public...."

So, are you admitting that you would have gone along with the Clinton/Lewinski lying and corruption----it's an honor thing.

[Moby Grape]

THEY WERE NOT ILLEGAL...STOP LISTENING TO LIBERALS WHO LIE.

[LetsRok]

Not to pass judgement or anything, but could it be that Linda Tripp is still unemployed because employers are reticent to hire someone who has illegally recorded private conversations, and then made those recordings public? A trust issue, perhaps?

No, Linda Tripp is unemployed because she can't get a non-government employer to pay over $100k to do the same job in the private sector. She was probably over compensated as a government employee and private sector jobs do not pay $100k for that skill set.

[the catfish]

Jarhead_22 More like Emptyhead_00