Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators Challenge Ashcroft on Guns
AP | 12/7/01 | AP

Posted on 12/07/2001 3:31:47 PM PST by anniegetyourgun

WASHINGTON- Attorney General John Ashcroft's refusal to give information to the FBI about criminal background checks on gun buyers is chafing several senators. They plan to do what Ashcroft challenged them to do: change the law.

Ashcroft told the Senate Judiciary Committee that gun data from the National Instant Criminal Background Check System can't be shared with investigative agencies looking into the Sept. 11 attacks, including the FBI.

At Thursday's hearing, the attorney general said that if lawmakers have a problem with that, they should change the law.

"Not that you want me to enforce some laws and not other laws and you want to ignore laws, or respect some rights and not other rights," Ashcroft told senators. "I'm very pleased to tell you that if you send me the legislation, I'll review it."

On Friday Sen. Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat and a member of the Judiciary Committee, introduced a bill allowing the FBI to check the NICS logs.

Meanwhile, some critics accuse Ashcroft of being hypocritical, given the Bush administration's recent decisions to implement a number of anti-terrorism measures without consulting Congress beforehand.

"The Department of Justice must not put the interests of the gun lobby above the nation's public safety in the battle against terrorism," said Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who is cosponsoring Schumer's bill.

"They have been a bull in a china shop when it comes to civil liberties, stretching their authority past the breaking point, detaining suspects and witnesses, permitting eavesdropping on detainees' conversations with attorneys and authorizing military tribunals," said Mathew Nosanchuk, lawyer for the Violence Policy Center.

Meanwhile, Ashcroft's spokeswoman issued a statement Friday decrying news accounts of the attorney general's statements at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing the day before.

Mindy Tucker said reports suggesting that Ashcroft was critical of those who don't agree with him were inaccurate. He opposes the "spread of misinformation," she said.

"Ashcroft was very clear he wanted public debate," Tucker said. "Anyone who reported that he criticized anyone who opposed him was absolutely wrong and in doing so became part of the exact problem he was describing."

Justice Department officials say they stand by the decision to deny FBI access to the records but said they are reviewing the regulations and will consider legislation submitted by Congress.

At issue is NICS, the system that electronically checks law enforcement records while gun buyers are waiting to make purchases. Felons, drug users, people subject to domestic violence restraining orders and illegal aliens are among those prohibited from buying guns.

A Justice Department regulation says the NICS logs can only be used to make sure the system is working properly. Ashcroft says giving the records to the FBI to check is not an audit function; others say the FBI should audit the system to see if it has failed by allowing illegal immigrants to purchase guns.

Asked why the department doesn't change the regulation on its own to make it clear, a Justice Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said, "There's very little wiggle room for us to amend" the regulation.

The official said the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms were asked after Sept. 11 to submit requests for regulatory and legislative changes that would help them investigate terrorism. The FBI and ATF did not ask for changes that would have allowed agents to use gun buyer data for investigative purposes, the official said.

Gun laws prohibit certain people from buying guns, including felons and most aliens. Terrorism suspects are not among those prohibited from gun purchases, the official said.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 12/07/2001 3:31:47 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
What good would accessing the Brady Database do anyway? If they were approved then it was legal for them to have a gun. Most of those being held are here illegally, one way or another, so the system should have not approved them. Mere possession of a gun is not evidence of any criminal or terroristic status, much as Lizard Face and his ilk would like it to be.

Besides, no guns were used or as far as we know even possessed by the terrorists. They used box cutters, not guns or anything else under the purview of Chuckies favorite agency the BATF.

2 posted on 12/07/2001 3:47:13 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
There you go using logic against Shameful Schumer.
3 posted on 12/07/2001 3:53:09 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
ping
4 posted on 12/07/2001 3:56:56 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Other than trumping up some unrelated charges on the suspects in custody, what good would consulting NICS do, other than establish a precedent and gun registry? Aye, there's the rub...
5 posted on 12/07/2001 3:57:33 PM PST by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Did you notice that all the whiners were the same democrats that complained about civil liberty violations?
6 posted on 12/07/2001 3:58:56 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Something promising from this power grabber.
7 posted on 12/07/2001 4:01:41 PM PST by NC_Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
On Friday Sen. Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat and a member of the Judiciary Committee, introduced a bill allowing the FBI to check the NICS logs.

Wasn't this the law that had the 'guarantee' that there would never be logs kept on the NICS system in the first place.

Handing a democrat a list of gun-owners is like providing an address registry of Jews to Hitler; not a good idea.

8 posted on 12/07/2001 4:02:07 PM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Gee, I was told that they weren't keeping any records at all. Once a person was approved the record was supposed to be destroyed. When I asked my Senator's office about this (Warner - RINO, VA), I was told that they were destroying them and when I asked if there was any oversight, I was told that we should just trust them.

So I guess they have been maintaining a database of all firearms purchses after all. Who would have thought?

9 posted on 12/07/2001 4:02:28 PM PST by L_Von_Mises
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L_Von_Mises
They keep the records for 90 days after 90 days I believe they are deleted out of the system. This is very easy to do with an automatic electronic database.
10 posted on 12/07/2001 4:05:50 PM PST by Libertarian_4_eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian_4_eva
" I believe they are deleted out of the system. "

Any way to find out for sure?

11 posted on 12/07/2001 4:17:05 PM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian_4_eva
after 90 days I believe they are deleted out of the system

You are right, there is a set time that they are supposed to be kept, but what bothers me is that there is no oversight and believing and knowing are two very different things. It sounds to me like they have been retaining the records for longer periods or there would be no real point in asking to search it. I know that for a long time they were not destroying them and the NRA sued to force them to do what the law said. Again, just because they say they are doesn't mean they really are.

There is the possibility that Chuckie is just using this as a springboard to retaining them. This would not only give him a national gun registration database, but also access to it. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to figure out the next step.

12 posted on 12/07/2001 4:19:02 PM PST by L_Von_Mises
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
I believe Ashcroft testified that they were using the records of those who had their applications rejected.
13 posted on 12/07/2001 4:19:17 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian_4_eva; *bang_list
They keep the records for 90 days after 90 days I believe they are deleted out of the system. This is very easy to do with an automatic electronic database.

Almost as easy as making backup copies of the files on zip disks?

14 posted on 12/07/2001 5:01:22 PM PST by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian_4_eva
They keep the records for 90 days after 90 days I believe they are deleted out of the system. This is very easy to do with an automatic electronic database.

In NRA v. Reno, it was decided that they could keep the records for 6 months.

From Brady v. Reno, at FindLaw:

The first Brady Act provision the NRA relies on is section 922(t)(2):

If receipt of a firearm would not [be unlawful], the system shall-

(A) assign a unique identification number to the trans- fer; (B) provide the [firearms dealer] with the number; and (C) destroy all records of the system with respect to the call (other than the identifying number and the date the number was assigned) and all records of the system relating to the person or the transfer.

18 U.S.C. § 922(t)(2). According to the NRA, when the statute says "destroy all records" it means "destroy all rec- ords immediately," not within six months. That is certainly one possible interpretation of section 922(t)(2)(C). . . . the question is whether the statute unambiguously requires immediate destruction. We think the answer is no.
15 posted on 12/07/2001 5:17:36 PM PST by sonjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Last time I recall reading the gun grabers were saying the Brady law had stoped all sorts of Felons from buying Guns. Is the FBI now going to use the records to arrest thos Felons? Or is it just a way to list Gun owners?
16 posted on 12/07/2001 10:54:47 PM PST by 20yearvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L_Von_Mises
So I guess they have been maintaining a database of all firearms purchses after all. Who would have thought

What! you mean a politician would lie to the public? Thick Sarcasm

Saddle up Paul Revere, we shall need you soon...

17 posted on 12/07/2001 11:23:38 PM PST by 180grain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: anniegetyourgun
White House counsel Alberto Gonzales was just on Wolf Blitzer's Sunday show saying the White House 'would probably' support using the gun check database for checking on terrorists gun purchases. This is illegal. Gonzales wants to be on the Supreme Court. He's a liberal. Pro-abortion and anti gun. This man must be outted and stopped.

"Four times, state judges have denied teenagers' wishes to have an abortion without telling their parents, and for the fourth time on Wednesday, the Texas Supreme Court ordered those judges to think again. . . .

The majority of the court - led by Chief Justice Tom Phillips and joined by Justice Craig Enoch, James A. Baker, Deborah Hankinson, Harriet O'Neill and Alberto Gonzales - said the girl's emotional well-being and the long-term family relationship needed to be considered."

Article

19 posted on 12/09/2001 10:05:16 AM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
On Friday Sen. Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat and a member of the Judiciary Committee, introduced a bill allowing the FBI to check the NICS logs.


20 posted on 12/09/2001 12:03:35 PM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson