Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DKM
Which part of "SHALL BE 6 YEARS" is unclear for you. Maybe I can help. Keep in mind that shall means must in legal jargon.

BTW, no one ever accused me of being or even aiding liberals before. You can go off half cocked that Berry has no case if you want but I believe it can backfire. She does have a case. It may not pan out but its not entirely groundless.

335 posted on 12/08/2001 2:48:18 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
Once again, the bylaws are obviously intended for initial appointments, and through lack of detail does not discuss replacement terms, such as those of the numerous other committees posted to this site. What you posted is a conclusion based on ommission of data, and is therefore not a fact in court.

What part of "shall expire on 11/29/01" do you not understand, as stated in the replacment letter by WJC. That little tidbit is a fact. But again the courts will decide, independant of Berry's desires. Who knows?

It will be interesting though to see how all this pans out, due mostly to a lot of quotes and actions by Berry that are coming to the surface now, via this charade. She has been operating in a vaccuum for years, and is now in the virtual fishbowl. Claiming to be "independent" to sway the "bipartison-by-design" committee to the liberal side, stating that civil rights do not apply to white men, as well as publicly wishing for S. Thurmonds death may backfire on the liberals.

336 posted on 12/08/2001 3:02:20 PM PST by DKM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson