Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John H K
Which had no anthrax, therby making it irrelevant.

Which it was claimed had no anthrax, and which Kenyan government agencies nevertheless insisted did have anthrax. Maybe the letter really had no anthrax, and maybe this is more of how our government has been lying to us, so as to divert suspicion from Iraq.

82 posted on 12/06/2001 5:20:21 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides
It's KENYA that says it doesn't contain anthrax. The letter was from the doctor's daughter, btw.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A44845-2001Oct24

"NAIROBI, Oct. 24 – Authorities today retracted last week's "confirmed" finding of anthrax bacteria in a letter mailed Sept. 8 to Kenya from Atlanta. A subsequent test found the white powder on damp pieces of fabric in the envelope was mildew or fungus."

Amazing the desperate lengths people go to to cling desperately to the various foreign anthrax letters.

It's pretty hilarious. Gubbmint conspiracies are supposed to deflect attention from the government as a cause (TWA 800 nutters, chime in). But now gubbmint conspiracies are to BLAME the government to deflect attention away from foreign countries. Gotcha.

90 posted on 12/06/2001 5:28:23 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson