This because access to the perimeter defences is easily achieved. To his credit, the new US ambassador has made conventional blast protection a prioroty there. However it would be much more effective for the Islamic entente to contaminate the facility than to waste a tactical nuke on such a targert.
I would tend to think however that Islamic entente forces would not use such a device against Serbs or Croats -- although the technical knowledge to construct such a device definately exists in Sarajevo.
How many Bosnian leaders have left the country in recent days? When you get down the list a bit, ask yourself why Mladen Ivanic is in China until Sunday? Remember how he conveniently left the RS right before the Banja Luka riots earlier this year concerning the rebuilding of the mosque?
I suspect attacks in Bosnia will be conventional. US and Brit personnel remain quite vulnerable there -- one or two deaths will be front page news.
I cannot begin to tell you how confident I am that the Islamic entente has "Allah's Suitcase" capability. If you have access to contacts with the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, you might want to ask about Mr D's report to them late last year reference the availability of nuclear components from Russia via Chechnya.
Regardless, the fact that SFOR is backtracking on this report is not a good sign. You might also look into certain Iranian born bankers in Istanbul Friday. Remember that Russian devices are purchased with two payments. Half on delivery (usually with a hostage) and the remainder upon successful activation...
The forces of freedom on the move. Europe trembles.
...and contaminate many more moslems? That would go down really well. Hey, why not go for the American Embassy in Saudi Arabia? Your powers of crock increase with age, rather like cheese.
VRN