Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IMRight; All
The second "account" does not say that there was no water and the first "account" does not say that there was no land.

Maybe it's all just a nice story to explain why we are here--after all, Moses' people could not have comprehended the mechanisms of evolution and the Big Bang if God would have revealed that to him.

8 posted on 12/06/2001 6:42:07 AM PST by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: JediGirl
Maybe it's all just a nice story to explain why we are here

Well, I totally agree with you in that these creation myths were orally handed down, borrowed from other cultures and expanded on to include the people's idea of God and the beginning of the world and humankind and then were written by DIFFERENT writers, all in a spiritually inspired attempt to make sense of the world around them.

I can't understand how anyone can take Genesis as science.

When you think about it, what kind of truths do you expect to find in the Bible?

Historical facts? NO
Scientific truth? NO

What I do expect to find in the bible is MORAL TRUTH-but even some of those have been revised as we've evolved as a people. We no longer condone slavery or the taking of many wives, or treating woman as property. But for those who read the Bible literally, these things are OK because they are in the Bible??

20 posted on 12/06/2001 6:51:47 AM PST by Weatherman123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson