[Weatherman123]

Discussion?

[Weatherman123]

discussion?

[Cleburne]

I fail to see how this supposed second creation story is interpreted as such. It is not another creation acount: it is the forming of the Garden of Eden. It does not speak of some different version of creation of the world, nor does it add on details to said creation, it is a creation story only in that it details the creation if you will of the Garden of Eden. Whether you wish to see Eden as some kind of wavy story detailing some good moral (and thus disavow the entire Bible and salvation) is fine with me, but lets not pretend its another creation story, shall we?