Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ccmay
"I'm a radiologist involved in disaster planning for my local hospitals. I recently spoke to an FBI agent specializing in weapons of mass destruction. They are worried sick about the "dirty bomb." He thinks this is much more likely than a smallpox epidemic or true nuclear detonation."

And also WAY less likekly to do significant damage than either said epidemic or nuclear detonation. Sure, it will contaminate a small area pretty badly, and scare the **** out of a lot of people, but the conventional explosive simply cannot spread the rad-waste broadly enough to cause major loss of life.

10 posted on 12/05/2001 2:43:51 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
Sure, it will contaminate a small area pretty badly, and scare the **** out of a lot of people, but the conventional explosive simply cannot spread the rad-waste broadly enough to cause major loss of life.

You are correct. However, the psychological effect is likely to be an order of magnitude more shocking than 9/11.

-ccm

25 posted on 12/05/2001 7:26:17 PM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson