Skip to comments.
A Tiny Splinter ( Israel)
Drudge Report ^
| 12/4/01
| Deb Weiss
Posted on 12/04/2001 11:12:43 AM PST by Jean S
A VIEW FROM HERE
by deb weiss
every tuesday
A Tiny Splinter
December 4, 2001
Of all the possible reasons for supporting the state of Israel, I choose the one most consistent with everything else I believe in with all my heart: I support Israel because it is a tiny splinter of civilization in a sea of barbarism.
For all its sins (and even its most passionate friends cannot claim it as any sort of Utopia, at least not with the same straight face Nation magazine staffers adopt when they talk about Cuba, say), Israel is a piece of the West. It embodies the values and institutions of the West, including a fiercely healthy impulse toward capitalism, civil libertarianism, democracy, individualism.
It is a modern state, dynamic, progressive in the best sense of the word, strikingly civilized in a region where slavery, hideous poverty, corruption, and the crude oppression of women are commonplace. (Whatever the Good Lord may have in store for us in the next life, I'd just as soon spend this one in thoroughly Westernized surroundings.)
The American elite does not on the whole share my sensibility. Most clever people - academics, journalists, Social Critics - despise Israel passionately. Indeed, for half a century, give or take, it's been practically mandatory in certain circles to despise Israel passionately. By now, most clever people are so accustomed to despising Israel passionately that they hardly comprehend how it all began, before most of them were even born.
It's a sort of political atavism, a quaint Cold War hangover, part of the Groupthink inheritance of the Baby Boom. Israel had sinned grievously, especially in 1948, by throwing its lot in with the capitalist imperialist West. This should have come as no surprise to anyone, even American intellectuals, since the founders of the modern state of Israel were Western in both culture and outlook, but it was regarded as exceedingly bad form just the same. In the event, this vast, politically-correct disapproval of Israel lingered long after the political moment itself was gone.
Meanwhile, as the Second World War drew to a close, and with their former German chums on the ropes, Arab factions began to glide effortlessly into the Soviet sphere of influence. Such enlightened states as Iraq, Syria and Yemen were already writing the bloody future history of the region when they devised the Alexandria Protocol in the autumn of 1944: the Protocol, despite its progressive veneer, was a retrograde and virulently anti-Zionist document.
With two sides to choose from - one cosmopolitan, Western and democratic, the other tribal, bigoted, brutal, and anti-democratic -- Pro-Soviet American intellectuals didn't have to think twice (they never did, alas - sometimes not even once, especially with Moscow to tell them who was naughty or nice). As usual, they chose wrong.
To be sure, the intellectual left's loathing of Israel had a more primal source as well. Right-wing kooks are not the only Jew-haters on the planet, and the left has its own complement of anti-Semites (a fact that comes as something of a shock to those right-wing kooks who are stubbornly convinced that all left-wing intellectuals ARE Jews). In recent years, these subterranean hatreds have fattened on the Democratic Party's politics of race, which have obliged Party strategists to tolerate, if not actively exploit, black anti-Semitism, including the egregious Jew-baiting of such luminaries as Jesse Jackson and Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney.
Of course, there's more than enough posh, white liberal anti-Semitism to go around. During the Gulf War, for instance, when Israeli cities were targeted by Iraq, ABC's notoriously Israel-unfriendly newsreader, Peter Jennings (himself quite a clever fellow), created a minor flurry - though only on the right - when he sneeringly suggested that courageous Israeli concert-goers who refused to leave their seats during an air raid were merely trying to "get their money's worth".
Little wonder Arab radicals have found it both fun and profitable to play to Western political elites, and especially the American press, with English-language protest signs and sound-bites so neatly tailored to fit the current journalistic fashions that you half expect to see Paul Begala lurking at the elbow of the latest PLO spokeswoman, feeding her phrases cunningly focus-tested on the editorial board of The New York Times.
Still, in the wake of last weekend 's Hamas terror, you felt a shift, a shivering of the political karma.
Despite the best efforts of James Carville and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, it seems we have not yet altogether forgotten September 11th. We have our own dead, too, now - ordinary people, slaughtered senselessly and without warning by madmen who hate us because we are who we are. All at once, it does not become us to counsel restraint in the face of terror.
Yesterday's White House affirmation of Israel's right of self-defense was a remarkable break with the delicate 'equivalency' dance that has been the posture of American politicians of both parties and all political stripes for much too long. Although the Pavlovian press is salivating to denounce Israel for acts of 'retaliation' (the press expects Israel to be a peacemaker in much the same way it expects Republicans to be bipartisan), it cannot, it really cannot -- not with the smug zest it would have displayed on September 10th.
We have come to understand this much: Western civilization really is at risk - including that one tiny splinter of it, locked in a sea of barbarism.
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
1
posted on
12/04/2001 11:12:43 AM PST
by
Jean S
To: JeanS
It's good to see an Israel firster admitting that support for Israel cannot be justified by appealing to American national interests.
To: traditionalist
The survival of an outpost of Western Civilization is not an American national interest?
To: JeanS
The Jewish people who chose to return to their ancestral homeland were handed a huge bunch of lemons.
They made lemonade, and sold it on a world market. Not to their neighbors, but to the Western world. What is commonly considered to be Western civilization had a lonely outpost in a distant and unforgiving land.
They made the desert bloom. Now those sons of Ishmael who had occupied that desert for the last couple of millennia, grew jealous. All that time they were the stewards of the land, they did little to raise the quality of life there, and perhaps they tired of being such poor chumps, but did little to change the situation.
Along come some pretty hungry and ingenious people, who took this rocky barren ground, and coaxed prodigious bounty from the land, showing the local indigents up in two ways - they were far more enterprising, and worse, they were the despicable Jews, whom the Muslim world considered to be vastly inferior.
Now nothing will do but to drive out the Jews, and seize their property, without compensation. Within a generation the entire region would look like Beirut, and of little use to anybody, but some deep craving would be satisfied.
Is this the future of the world?
To: JeanS
Deb! I knew her when.
As usual right on target!
5
posted on
12/04/2001 5:12:02 PM PST
by
tet68
To: traditionalist
God bless Israel!
And to hell with the anti-Semites, whether they be extreme right-wing militia types, limousine liberals, Jesse Jackasses, or libertarians. Israel will live and prosper.
6
posted on
12/04/2001 5:19:26 PM PST
by
Robert-J
To: tet68
Deb is a gem. I do miss her as Debo21.
7
posted on
12/04/2001 5:33:57 PM PST
by
Jean S
To: JeanS
Not a splinter, a sprout, alive and growing. One day to grow again into a great olive tree with a ruler the likes of which men can not even imagine.
To: JeanS
Bump a terrific essay.
Thanks for posting.
9
posted on
12/05/2001 7:20:01 AM PST
by
RJCogburn
To: denydenydeny
What exactly does this "outpost" gain us?
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: Harvard Man
Perhaps you should write some fiction. You can then be interviewed on Al Khazeera TV. Whoops! I meant that repository(more like, suppository)of jihadistic truth, the now ubiquitous Al Jazeera!
To: Harvard Man
Link to video please. If you're going to reference it, then let's see it, otherwise give it a rest.
13
posted on
12/07/2001 9:50:50 AM PST
by
TADSLOS
To: JeanS; *zion_ist; SJackson; anapikoros; white trash redneck; sheik yerbouty; Inyokern; Anamensis...
IFC *bump*
14
posted on
12/07/2001 9:54:59 AM PST
by
Alouette
To: Harvard Man
15
posted on
12/07/2001 9:59:48 AM PST
by
Alouette
To: traditionalist
It's good to see an Israel firster As usual, the self-proclaimed "America Firsters" prove their "patriotism" by labeling others.
16
posted on
12/07/2001 9:59:52 AM PST
by
BenF
To: Harvard Man
I have to remember this as I watch the video of the five arab kids being blown apart by a smiling Mossad agent - as he presses the dentonate button. Just as we all have to remember that not every "Harvard Man" is a Jew-hating bucket of scum who has to make up fantasies to support his delusions.
17
posted on
12/07/2001 10:01:44 AM PST
by
BenF
To: Harvard Man
I have to remember this as I watch the video of the five arab kids being blown apart by a smiling Mossad agent - as he presses the dentonate button. Go read the Palestinian scholar's article last week blaming the Palestinian authorities for not doing the proper clean up of debrie and saying that they bare reposnsibility for those kids.
You remind me of some communists: although generally intelligent, they were no longer able to think after years of propaganda.
Which vicious moron told that Mosad blew up those kids? The same one who told you that Mosad brought down the World Trade Center?
Listen: regardless of what you think of Israel and Jews in general, you cannot serve well your own people --- whoever they are --- when you allow yourself to be so brainwashed.
18
posted on
12/07/2001 10:04:53 AM PST
by
TopQuark
To: traditionalist
What exactly does this "outpost" gain us? If you do have access to George Will's archive, please look through a few of the last columns. Otherwise, I'll rty to answer.
19
posted on
12/07/2001 10:06:34 AM PST
by
TopQuark
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson