Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bin Laden Nuke Bomb Shock ( "dirty bomb" was a factor in the terror alert )
skynews ^ | 12/04/2001 | Staff

Posted on 12/04/2001 12:48:36 AM PST by KQQL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: snopercod
Large fuel rods, yes, I agree with you. However, what about rods from research reactors, or Cesium or Cobalt irradiation rods. It would take a lot of lead to transport, and the handlers themselves would probably receive a lethal dose (they are suicidal anyway), but it is a threat.
41 posted on 12/04/2001 5:32:51 AM PST by FreeAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
Somewhat true, but what if the highjackers that went into the WTC and Pentagon had a few 3 or 4 foot long Cobalt rods in their checked luggage? As long as it is taking to clean up the WTC, you could multiply that time by 10 fold if you added a radiation threat.
42 posted on 12/04/2001 5:36:52 AM PST by FreeAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: abwehr
to locate two missing computer hard drives containing U.S. nuclear secrets, officials say. The search continues for the missing hard drives.

Ask Clinton. He may have needed additional campaign money.
I'll bet he's still pis*ed about the Al Quata being way too late.
He told them December, they thought he said September.
He should've used Sprint.

43 posted on 12/04/2001 5:36:53 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: freefly
Your reply was excellent to the bent mind. Did you ask which agency he draws his paycheck from?
45 posted on 12/04/2001 2:40:38 PM PST by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: abwehr
Just who do you think has to be evaded and overcome to set one off? Are you really that stupid or are you just pulling my leg?

A "Dirty Bomb" is just a conventional explosive surrounded by radioactive material. Think of a pipe bomb surrounded by hazardous materials. Its explosion would create a hazardous radioactive mess but the explosion would be no larger than the power of the conventional explosives. Critical mass would not be acheived in the detonation. There would be no fissionable or thermonuclear components to the explosion.

The data on the N.E.S.T. hard-drives would not be applicable in this instance. Disarming a "Dirty Bomb" would be similar to handling a conventional bomb in a Hazmat suit. Nothing high-tech just messy and dangerous.

My brother was on the N.E.S.T team several years ago.

46 posted on 12/04/2001 6:33:32 PM PST by FreeLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
bump
47 posted on 12/04/2001 7:30:41 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: jammer
"Did you ask which agency he draws his paycheck from?"

No, he wouldn't have answered that either.
But it doesn't really matter.
He's working for them whether he gets paid or not.
49 posted on 12/05/2001 10:05:03 AM PST by freefly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson