Replies

Just a speculation but it's easily possible that the tail supports snapped enough in the wake turbulance to skew the tail so that the plane became un-controlable causing the plane to start to break up (engines coming off, etc) before the tail completely tore loose.

They have the voice recorder which tends to pick up sounds like explosions and they heard none before the flight data recorder started picking up drastic rudder swings.

No evidence of a bomb. Sorry conspiratorists.

"No evidence of a bomb."

Were you on the team who listened to the recording? Have you heard the entire recording? Who says there is no data supporting an explosion. Whoever that....NTSB? Do you actually beleive what they say? Why do you discount folks who say they saw an explosion....and a burning wing come off? Why is any explantion, other than the governments, a conspiracy? Do you think any government entity has lied to the public to further an agenda?

Just a speculation but it's easily possible that the tail supports snapped enough in the wake turbulance to skew the tail so that the plane became un-controlable causing the plane to start to break up (engines coming off, etc) before the tail completely tore loose.

The tail was found in the bay near Beach 105th Street. One of the engines was found on Beach 129th Street, the other close by. The plane passed over the 105th Street area before crashing a mile +/- beyond. Thus, the tail came off first.

They have the voice recorder which tends to pick up sounds like explosions and they heard none before the flight data recorder started picking up drastic rudder wings.....No evidence of a bomb.

Maybe an explosion caused by some sort of bomb caused the shuttering? That would explain the orange fireball seen by the witnesses. I personally know some of these witnesses and they are truthful people.

I never bought the wind turblence story. I'd love to see the tapes taken from the bridge. Why haven't they been released?

Where does your information come from? It is to the advantage of the government to have this crash classified as an accident. I'm not normally a conspiracy advocate, but in this case it makes sense. Who would fly knowing that this plane was taken out by terrorists?

Two "airframe rattles" were heard. Something imparted enough kinetic energy to that plane to make it rattle, twice. Wake turbulence you say?

Why has the NTSB studiously avoided all mention and releasing any information specific to the wings upon which eyewitnesses insist they saw explosions. They have never, to my knowledge, reported even looking at the wings.

IMHO, the truth is being deliberately kept quiet until such time as the Govt sees fit to release it, in an effort to prevent panic, protect the economy and forestall the criticism that so far, the Govt is largely unable to protect Americans from terrorist attacks...