[lavaroise]

Yep, like the NYT ignoring Hitler's actions in the 30s. Those reporters perfectly know how unrepentant Arafat and the Pali state is, yet they will request our repent and our answers to their questions about whether we have made the correct assessment of the situation, when the questions should be about how we are going to militarily get rid of the terrorists.

Why do they do that? Because reporters are liberal and unrepentant in their own ways. They fear that they will have to repent. They are sitting on the side of the terrorists, while, like an obsene version of Pilate defending real criminals, they claim they are washing their hands from the massacres and Israel's actions.

Unbelievable. I hunger to see those people go to hell.

[Criminal Number 18F]

Yep, like the NYT ignoring Hitler's actions in the 30s

Actually, more like the NYT promoting Stalin in the 30s. I was in their building last year... they still proudly claim Walter Duranty's Pulitzer Prize (for reporting that there was no famine in the Ukraine among other things).

The NYT is first about promoting its agenda, socialism. If a few people have to die in nasty ways, if we have to print some lies, if we set back civilisation by hundreds of years -- well, to the Times, the end justifies the means. It's all in pursuit of the millenial Greater Good.

Thanks to CG for posting this, and thanks to Bibi for standing up to these presstitutes. I wish more Americans would, it is unfortunate that we have to rely on a friendly foreigner to show us the way. (Although I believe that Netanyahu technically holds US citizenship, he is first and foremost an Israeli).

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F