HILLARY CLINTON -U. S. SENATOR- IS A KEY DEFENDENT IN LORAL SHAREHOLERS CASE ie. CHINAGATE

Judicial Watch ^ | 11/1/01 | Larry Klayman

[ChaseR]

As of 8/08/01, United States Senator, Hillary Rodham Clinton is a co-defendent in the Judicial Watch, Loral Shareholders case. This case was filed in federal court in Washington, D. C. This case formally accuses Senator Hillary Clinton, along with other defendents - of transfering technology to China. Co-defendents in this devastating case include, but are not limited to - William Jefferson Clinton, John Huang and Bernard Schwartz. This case is styled 01-CV-1715.

[ChaseR]

"I think Mr. "no-spin zone" O'Reilly and other Fox News hosts have gone just about as far with China-Riady gate as they are going to go."

Why - Why is this the case with O'Reilly??? Who can tell all of us why O'Reilly won't get down to the nuts and bolts of this Loral Shareholders case??

O'Reilly HASN'T EVEN MENTIONED THAT THIS LORAL SHAREHOLDERS CASE EVEN EXISTS??? WHY?? WHY?? WHY, IS O'REILLY ***NOT EVEN MENTIONING THAT THIS LORAL SHAREHOLDERS CASE - HAS NOW BEEN ACCEPTED INTO FEDERAL JUDGE LAMBERTH'S COURTROOM??? WHY?? WHY?? WHY?????

"O'Reilly, like most of his colleagues, decides just how far he wants to go in criticizing the "Washington establishment" and he won't go outside the parameters.

Back to WHY again????

[ChaseR]

Thank you and you too AG/BTTT

[ChaseR]

"Thank you for the ping. Verrrry interesting!"

yw, and things will be getting - a lot more interesting - very, very soon!

[ChaseR]

"He has done nothing significant on Ron Brown's death..."

Back to WHY again??

[ChaseR]

"I just bought O'Reilly's book..."

I didn't plan on reading this O'Reilly book, NOPE - not even close to buying it. (because I had already guessed that O'Reilly wouldn't cover Chinagate in this book of his. But guess what folks, a cousin of mine gave me the book as a Chanukah present! Oh well!!
Now, let me reflect on what I just wrote in the preceding paragraph: "...O'Reilly wouldn't cover Chinagate in this book of his."
--- --- And low and behold, I was right!! NOT ONE WORD IN THIS O'REILLY BOOK ABOUT LORAL, ABOUT BERNARD SCHWARTZ - ABOUT ANY OF THE DEFENDENTS IN THIS DEVASTATING LORAL SHAREHOLERS CASE. WHY NOT MR O'REILLY???????????

NOT ONE WORD IN THIS O'REILLY BOOK ABOUT LORAL, ABOUT BERNARD SCHWARTZ -
ABOUT ANY OF THE DEFENDENTS IN
THIS DEVASTATING LORAL SHAREHOLERS CASE. WHY NOT MR O'REILLY??????????? - NOT ONE WORD IN THIS O'REILLY BOOK ABOUT LORAL, ABOUT BERNARD SCHWARTZ - ABOUT ANY OF THE DEFENDENTS IN THIS DEVASTATING LORAL SHAREHOLERS CASE.
WHY NOT MR O'REILLY???????????

[Alamo-Girl]

volley bttt!

[poet]

It's almost supernatural the way both of them have escaped their well deserved justice. I still think of the Omen trilogy relative to the clintons.

I have never wanted justice to be served more than their whole gang being put in prison.

[ChaseR]

The only reference to Chinagate in this O'Reilly book is on page #88:

"Few could have guessed that the hits would just keep on coming in Clinton's second term with the Monica Lewinsky impeachment,
Chinese espionage, and hundreds of campaign finance violations linked to the poll-popular president."
The NO SPIN ZONE
Bill O'Reilly

Not another sentence, not one other word - in this ridiculous Spin book - about Chinagate...not one! Why???
I need to remember to call my cousin - to see if he'd mind if I ship this book back to him... so my cousin get his well-deserved refund!
(Mr O'Reilly, I have to consider this book of yours - halfbaked! Sorry, but you have failed your patriotic duty to your country! Big Time/No Cigar/Try again in your next book.....

[ChaseR]

"It's almost supernatural the way both of them have escaped their well deserved justice."

Things will be changing very soon!
GoLoralShareholdersCaseGo!

[poet]

bill o' is just another self serving whore, IMO. Like all neo-conservatives, they throw a nugget our way so as to get us on their side. I stopped watching him after his allowing his moronic buddy donahue spew his "garbage pit of human thought" with very litte challenge from bill o'

[poet]

Thanks for the heads up on this thread.
FReegards

[ChaseR]

"I stopped watching him..."

I'll tune in if he mentions Chinagate or Condit...that's about it.

[ChaseR]

yw/bttt

[ChaseR]

bttt

[ChaseR]

bttt

[LiberteeBell]

yw, and things will be getting - a lot more interesting - very, very soon!

I certainly hope you're right. Seems to me like the very fact that the clinton spin machine is revving up to high gear means something is on the horizon.......hope it's not just wishful thinking.

[zog]

"why?"--I don't "know" my best guess and analysis is the closer to being 'big" and establishment and mainstream that political commentators get, the less likely they would actually investigate and critice that 'establishment" because they are now part of it. witness the de-evolution of 'rush over the years. A long time ago he was consistently hard hitting, now, mostly ignoring and bowing to many sacred cows, as in no boat rocking. Same with o reilly basically. You'll see and hear the hard reporting from lesser well known folks, but as they move up the economic food chain they tend to mellow out,(and sell-out), way too many examples to help prove this there.

[goldilucky]

Thank you very much!