But they have their own equivalents. It's that soupy interim between one vital system setup, especially those involving reproduction, and another that bothers me. Too may of these systems are irreducibly complex. 
But they have their own equivalents. It's that soupy interim between one vital system setup, especially those involving reproduction, and another that bothers me. Too may of these systems are irreducibly complex.
I would think you would be happy with the fundamental laws of physics being irreducibly complex -- but marco chemical arrangments certainly are not.
Your limited ability to see the steps does not mean they didn't occur. Sorry -- but your argument is argument by ignorance. It just doesn't impress.
An example, please. The eye, wing and bombadier beatle have already been shown to not be irreducibly-complex features on other threads. We can recapitulate that here, if you'd like, but you may have to wait till Monday as I have to render unto Uncle Sam that which is Uncle Sam's (it's my drill weekend).