How sad that we went from the age of Jefferson and the nobility of man to the chaos and inhumanity of the post-Darwin world. It certainly can be argued that nearly all of society's problems have been greatly exacerbated due to the amoral foundation of Darwinism.
It's indisputable. An agglomoration of molecules has no basis for making moral judgements. Darwin didn't shy away from the social conclusions necessitated by his ruminations. Why should anyone here question the "great man"? Well, the "great man's" wool-gathering rhetoric is Humbug. I refer anyone who doubts this to Gertrude Himmelfarb's Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution. She utterly devastates poor Darwin. It is a book that should be on the lips of every anti-Darwinist.
How sad that we went from the age of Jefferson and the nobility of man to the chaos and inhumanity of the post-Darwin world. It certainly can be argued that nearly all of society's problems have been greatly exacerbated due to the amoral foundation of Darwinism.
Wha? It appears you forget the incidents of transferring smallpox laden blankets to Indian villages, or fierce battles where no quarter was given to either side--European or Indian. Yeah, that's pretty noble. Scalping, drawing and quartering, Iron maidens, decapitation, all sorts of good noble excitement. Are you really pining for the old way of life?