That was an announcement of my newfound uncertainty hours AFTER my initial "HOWLINFR is a Fake" announcement.
There is no contradiction. Of course I left it open to discussion. It was all anyone was discussing that afternoon. Was HOWLINFR real or fake? My early announcement that she was a fake (based on the assurances of our mutual friend) settled the issue for no one. So, that later post of mine began a thread whose purpose was to assemble in one place, all the pro-con arguments.
By the way, if you were never a member of the original Reunion, how is it that you are accessing posts their now?
I was wondering if you were going to call her a liar.
So, that later post of mine began a thread whose purpose was to assemble in one place, all the pro-con arguments.
Let me try to get this straight: you KNEW it wasn't me early on, but you just put up a thread to SEE what everybody else thought?
Why didn't you just tell them that somebody YOU TRUSTED told you it wasn't me and that was good enough for you?
All the time now I see posts bellowing that such-and-such should be banned - the moderators are deleting posts containing pics of "busty" 19th century artwork, I fear for this forum if it continues down this path. Why? Hell, who says we have to all get along??? That is what the UN-types want a big homogenized world-society (boring). If we allow certain people who fit the "mold" to post here and kick out the rest that dont agree with the status quo, then this place has already moved in the wrong direction.
Just my take.