I don't understand what has chuck allen upset. I have witnessed almost every dime that FR has raised in the last three years, with exception of the cruise, and chuck allen was right there leading the troops and observing the numbers. He often advocated a more thorough disclosure of the FR budget, but seemed content that only a vague accounting was possible because of the lawsuits.
I don't know what chuck allen said, but I bet it was in good faith and that there is some other issue that is mixed up in this mess. Chuck Allen has helped raise more money for FR over the years than most and deserves credit and thanks, imho.
Well, all I'd advise in a case like this one is to read and try to understand both sides of the issue. Was Chuck out of line? Was he asking too much? Was he using the wrong procedure?
I'm not trying to take sides or influence you in any way, just trying to show both sides of the argument. Also, this thread was started as a direct result of Chuck's questions on that (now deleted) thread. So I figured you might want to read the original questions and judge for yourself.
Regards,
Callahan