If only you put your clearly good mind and this much work into a worthy cause...
OF COURSE it's a conspiracy theory. Where in Sam Hill does my post say anything remotely to the contrary? The difference between my post and yours is that I backed up my suposition with facts, risk analysis, and logically extrapolated opinion, but yours is not backed up at all.
Could you post your contrarian position? I would like to read your views. As of now, your view seems to be the simple, unsubstantiated, negative of mine: "If someone had a motive and means, he didn't do it". Set me straight.
If only you put your clearly good mind and this much work into a worthy cause...
Thanks for the vote of confidence, but I'll determine what is "a worthy cause" on my own without checking first with the Worthy Cause Police.