Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Liberal Classic
Neither Unix nor Windows is free from security problems, generally speaking.

This has been my point all along. I am not a Windows zealot, but I truely detest the Unix/Linux/Solaris/etc crowd that believes that their OS is the best thing since sliced bread and NEVER has problems like Windows.

Glad we agree on this.

74 posted on 11/28/2001 2:40:00 PM PST by oc-flyfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: oc-flyfish
Heh, I feel the same way about some of the Windows boosters.

I'm not ashamed to say I earned my keep working with Microsoft products. Now days I work on mid-range unix servers. None of these vendors are perfect. IBM, Sun, Microsoft all have their patches.

I don't have a real high opinion of a lot of Microsoft software these days, but they've had a few hits, IMO. DOS 5.0 was good, and Visual Basic 1.0 was cool. VB had a built in development enviroment, the forerunner to Visual Studio. It was the bees knees back then when when you wrote a Windows program, you wrote in in DOS using MS C+ 6.0 (if I recall). Workbench was still a DOS application. Edit Code. Start Windows. Run Program. Crash. Reboot. Edit Code. Start Windows. Run Program. Crash. Reboot. Frankly, Windows has come a long way.

I am not a computer bigot. Compuers are apolitical. They're machines. Use what suits you. For some people, that's Windows, for others a Mac. Some people need large, expensive servers, and some people need cheap boxes. Linux is really good, better than a lot of people who bash it realize. People that knock it really haven't seen what it can do.

92 posted on 11/28/2001 2:54:49 PM PST by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson