Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JustAnAmerican
Now, Now, blaming the Linux OS for wu-ftp's shortcomings is kind of like blaming Windows for the flaws in Norton Utilities. Just so you know, wu-ftp is a program run under Linux not Linux itself. And just like lots of NU customers, most people that used or had heard about the flaws in wu-ftp switched over to other packages years ago. On the other hand the MS OS itself is still very un-secure and flakey.

I disagree. If the OS allows a program to breach its (the OS's) file security, the problem is at least equally with the OS.

35 posted on 11/28/2001 2:05:18 PM PST by danneskjold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: danneskjold
If the ftp daemon is run as a normal user in a chroot jail, there would be no access to the file system in general, despite a bug like this one. Hence, it is not a general OS problem.
40 posted on 11/28/2001 2:10:00 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: danneskjold
I disagree. If the OS allows a program to breach its (the OS's) file security, the problem is at least equally with the OS.

But it is not necessarily a breach in the OS' file system.  In order to work, many programs need root (or system) privileges.  If the program has a bug in it which allows a breach of OS integrity, it is not necessarily a problem with the OS (since with root privs you must necessarily be able to do anything).
321 posted on 11/30/2001 11:38:50 AM PST by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson