Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: biblewonk
But then again, if you are in a private nudist camp you are doing public nudity. The definition of public is not: a place where people are dressed or on public property.

Nice try, but no. In a legal sense, what's "public" and what's "private" is fairly well-defined, and it's nothing like you've estimated.

82 posted on 11/28/2001 8:04:29 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Hemingway's Ghost
Nice try, but no. In a legal sense, what's "public" and what's "private" is fairly well-defined, and it's nothing like you've estimated.

You are talking about the court of law now. Maybe the concern of the city is the morality of people all just getting naked together. This would be a classic case of imposing your morality on someone else but that is what all law is about.

86 posted on 11/28/2001 8:09:42 AM PST by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson