Secondly, I was commenting on historical fact.
I know you were commenting on historical fact. You were doing so to show that you approved of those historical facts, were you not? Those historical facts, with which I am well acquainted, included limited religious freedom for non-Christians. I was pointing out that I cannot understand what philosophical distinctions you are using to distinguish Christianity, Judaism and other religions. I can only think of a religious justification for that type of distinction. But that isn't adequate for a political system.