Posted on 11/27/2001 1:14:12 PM PST by notyourregularhandle
SEATTLE - Maybe it's time to just round up all the smokers.
We can send authorities out to rip little babies from the arms of those Marlboro smokin' moms. Dads can stoically drag on a Lucky Strike as their kids watch them being hauled away.
Why not? Smokers are all pariahs; a blight on society whose only value is the ever-increasing tax revenue they provide by their pitiful purchases of packs and cartons of tobacco.
With passage of Initiative 773, that tax revenue takes a big bump up. Maybe.
I-773 adds another .60 cents in tax to each and every pack of cigarettes. On Jan. 1, that'll total out to $1.43 tax per pack.
Now, while smokers may be pariahs, they're not stupid. They can get a better deal at tribal smokeshops. They can order tax-free cigarettes over the Internet. Of course, it's illegal to do that.
Which has redrawn the attention of state authorities and state economists. With dollar signs lighting up their eyes, state folks are trying to figure out how to trap those swindling smokers.
'Cause if they can catch 'em, then they can fine them.
Oooooh, MORE revenue!
Who should be next? Tax cheaters who buy expensive clothes and stereos online, slicing the state out of the take?
How about we frisk grandma as she comes back from Oregon with a couple of untaxed bottles of peppermint schnapps in her purse?
Forget it. That's a bad idea. See, they're "good" citizens.
Smokers? They're easy targets. Who'd speak out for someone dumb enough to be sucking addictive, unhealthy crap into their lungs? Tax 'em with impunity!
By the way, time to fess up here. I smoke.
So, who knows. Maybe someday you can round us all up; snatch the babies from our arms; send us off to where we'll never be heard from again (once the tax coffers are filled).
Then? Well, then you can go after those red meat eaters!
You read wrong. Even the Congressional Research Service, at the request of an anti-smoking Congresscritter said that smokers MORE than pay their own way as far as health care costs are concerned.
WOW - what a way to make friends and influence people.
I would have loved to have been your drill sargeant. You really should change your screen name to NAMBYMARINE - as in namby pamby.
But I'm partial to the doublecheesburgers.
Yep, and the antis in Nevada have their panties all in a wad about it. "Officials start to craft ballot measure on smoking restrictions--Kenny behind plan to ensure cleaner air in restaurants, other public places" from the Las Vegas Review-Journal, November 9, 2001.
You read wrong.
I guess I missed the part where smoking was outlawed in Nevada. Reno is still in Nevada.... right?
It's the Jenkins Act. Now, you're probably asking yourself 'what the hay is the Jenkins Act?' And I'd love to be able to tell you, but the file that contains that information is corrupted, so I'll have to get back to you on the details.
The anti-smoker ordinances are not federal, only some of the taxes are. A few states, like Kookiefornia, have statewide bans, but most of the ordinances are local. The antis like it that way: it's far easier to hoodwink a few local yokels on the council than an entire state legislature.
Your ADDICTION is costing me money
You make the mistake of assuming that those monies come from your tax dollars. They don't. Ever heard of insurance? Apparently not.
Well at the rate we're going...hold your breath! ;) lol
Thanks for the info! ;)
I knew this! I'm a nurse and worked in long term care facilities for several years. There were still a few smokers around in their 80's, but NO obese residents.
Federal law? What federal law? There are federal regulations that prohibit smoking in federal buildings, but there isn't a federal law prohibiting smoking in public places (read the Constitution to find out what pervue the Feds have with respect to laws that affect the states and those who live therein).
Are those state laws that prohibit smoking in offices? They have been in effect here in CA for at least 8 years. Also no smoking in restaurants ( know that's a state law).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.