Skip to comments.
Why not just round up ALL the smokers???
KOMO TV ^
| 11/27/2001
| Ken Schram
Posted on 11/27/2001 1:14:12 PM PST by notyourregularhandle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: notyourregularhandle
BTTT
To: NAMMARINE
I have read out of every dollar spent on healthcare sixty sents of it is spent on SMOKING REALTED ILLNESSES. You read wrong. Even the Congressional Research Service, at the request of an anti-smoking Congresscritter said that smokers MORE than pay their own way as far as health care costs are concerned.
62
posted on
11/27/2001 5:39:21 PM PST
by
Gabz
To: NAMMARINE
sooo everyone that disagrees with you ADDICTED sickos are NAZIS??????- NICE! WOW - what a way to make friends and influence people.
I would have loved to have been your drill sargeant. You really should change your screen name to NAMBYMARINE - as in namby pamby.
63
posted on
11/27/2001 5:42:21 PM PST
by
Gabz
To: Gabz
I loved the Irony when McDonalds was one of the first restaurants to ban smoking,"Out of concern for peoples health", whilst shovin' artery clogging big macs down their throats.
But I'm partial to the doublecheesburgers.
To: Saundra Duffy
Say, did you know you can still smoke in the casinos in Reno? Yep, and the antis in Nevada have their panties all in a wad about it. "Officials start to craft ballot measure on smoking restrictions--Kenny behind plan to ensure cleaner air in restaurants, other public places" from the Las Vegas Review-Journal, November 9, 2001.
To: NAMMARINE
Hobey Baker makes a detailed, reasoned reply to your argument, and you reply with this lazy, ignorant SHOUT. Did you read his post? Did you understand it? Did you even try? If not, why don't you just F..F..F..FADE AWAY!
To: NAMMARINE
I have read out of every dollar spent on healthcare sixty sents of it is spent on SMOKING REALTED ILLNESSES.You read wrong.
To: Saundra Duffy
Say, did you know you can still smoke in the casinos in Reno? I guess I missed the part where smoking was outlawed in Nevada. Reno is still in Nevada.... right?
68
posted on
11/27/2001 6:06:39 PM PST
by
cidrasm
To: notyourregularhandle
"Why is that? Are cigarettes singled out from the "No tax on internet" bill that was just extended for two years?" ...I was wondering that myself...anyone have any answers as to why it is illegal???It's the Jenkins Act. Now, you're probably asking yourself 'what the hay is the Jenkins Act?' And I'd love to be able to tell you, but the file that contains that information is corrupted, so I'll have to get back to you on the details.
The anti-smoker ordinances are not federal, only some of the taxes are. A few states, like Kookiefornia, have statewide bans, but most of the ordinances are local. The antis like it that way: it's far easier to hoodwink a few local yokels on the council than an entire state legislature.
To: BunnySlippers
I didn't think smoking indoors was illegal in Nevada. Every restaurant I have ever been to there has a smoking section.
To: NAMMARINE
I have read out of every dollar spent on healthcare sixty sents of it is spent on SMOKING REALTED ILLNESSES.Your ADDICTION is costing me money
You make the mistake of assuming that those monies come from your tax dollars. They don't. Ever heard of insurance? Apparently not.
71
posted on
11/27/2001 6:27:36 PM PST
by
cidrasm
Comment #72 Removed by Moderator
To: WileyCoyote22
I think it's time to tax the air we breath, that way everbody will be taxed, we'll call it the fair-air tax ....Well at the rate we're going...hold your breath! ;) lol
To: notyourregularhandle
The GESTAPO at work!!!
Don't those moronic wackos realize they won't get the taxes!!! Can you say totalitarians? American talibans!
74
posted on
11/27/2001 6:34:54 PM PST
by
poet
To: Max McGarrity
It's the Jenkins Act. Now, you're probably asking yourself 'what the hay is the Jenkins Act?' And I'd love to be able to tell you, but the file that contains that information is corrupted, so I'll have to get back to you on the details. The anti-smoker ordinances are not federal, only some of the taxes are. A few states, like Kookiefornia, have statewide bans, but most of the ordinances are local. The antis like it that way: it's far easier to hoodwink a few local yokels on the council than an entire state legislature.Thanks for the info! ;)
To: boop
I am a physician, and I will tell you that OBESITY is a MUCH bigger risk figure for people than smoking.I knew this! I'm a nurse and worked in long term care facilities for several years. There were still a few smokers around in their 80's, but NO obese residents.
76
posted on
11/27/2001 6:37:26 PM PST
by
Nubbin
To: BunnySlippers
Oh, I totally agree ... I'm just amazed that Nevada manages to get around what I thought was a federal lawFederal law? What federal law? There are federal regulations that prohibit smoking in federal buildings, but there isn't a federal law prohibiting smoking in public places (read the Constitution to find out what pervue the Feds have with respect to laws that affect the states and those who live therein).
77
posted on
11/27/2001 6:41:09 PM PST
by
cidrasm
To: cidrasm
Federal law? What federal law? Are those state laws that prohibit smoking in offices? They have been in effect here in CA for at least 8 years. Also no smoking in restaurants ( know that's a state law).
To: Nubbin; boop
Bless you both.
To: BunnySlippers
State and local, municipal or county, not federal ordinances ban smoking in various places.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson