Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ashcroft: No release of 'black list'
UPI | 11/27/01 | MICHAEL KIRKLAND

Posted on 11/27/2001 3:57:37 AM PST by kattracks

WASHINGTON, Nov 26, 2001 (United Press International via COMTEX) -- The Justice Department will soon resume releasing the numbers -- but not the names -- of those detained in connection with the massive investigation of the Sept. 11 terror attacks, Attorney General John Ashcroft said Monday.

He insisted that releasing the names of those detained, as well as other details, would constitute an illegal "black list."

In describing the department's position, Ashcroft reached back for a term from the McCarthy era, when the entertainment industry and other industries developed "black lists" of those believed to harbor communist sympathies.

It would be "a violation of (privacy) rights for me to develop ... some sort of black list of people being held," Ashcroft told reporters at a Justice Department news conference.

An overall list might also be of interest to Osama bin Laden, the suspected mastermind behind the Sept. 11 attacks now apparently at bay in the mountains of Afghanistan.

"Let bin Laden develop his own list," Ashcroft said.

The department stopped releasing the totals of those being held last month.

At that time, the number of those who had been arrested or detained in connection with the investigation was just under 1,200.

But that figure included all those arrested by federal, state and local law enforcement after they were investigated by the FBI.

The new figure, expected later this week, will include only those being held after arrests by federal authorities.

None of those in custody so far have been charged directly in the Sept. 11 attacks.

Less than 160 have been held on immigration violations; another "handful," according to FBI Director Robert Mueller, are being held on material witness warrants issued by a federal judge.

All of those in custody have been charged after they were found to be in violation of a law, Ashcroft said Monday, and all have been given access to attorneys.

He insisted that even as terrorist networks were being destroyed overseas, the Justice Department's get-tough policy for anyone caught up in the domestic investigation is "disrupting the terrorist network in our own country."

On another front, Ashcroft said the purported warning of a threat against U.S. natural gas pipelines last week was of "undetermined reliability."

Despite the lack of credibility, the attorney general said, "we have a very serious approach to all the strategic assets of the United States. "They have been the subject of regular efforts, not just for natural gas, but for nuclear energy, other infrastructural components," Ashcroft said. "Industry representatives and those who have been waging the war of disruption and detection here at the federal level have been in regular communication, and by that -- sometimes in daily, but in multi-week -- multi-communications per week, for a long time."

By MICHAEL KIRKLAND, UPI Legal Affairs Correspondent

Copyright 2001 by United Press International.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/27/2001 3:57:37 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
re:
"....The department stopped releasing the totals of those being
held
last month.

At that time, the number of those who had been arrested or
detained
in connection with the investigation was just under 1,200.

But that figure included all those arrested by federal, state
and local
law enforcement after they were investigated by the FBI.

The new figure, expected later this week, will include only those
being held after arrests by federal authorities.

None of those in custody so far have been charged directly
in the Sept. 11 attacks
......."

If that above statement doesn't scare people, then perhaps we're
ready for the return of Janet Reno.

 

 

2 posted on 11/27/2001 4:09:19 AM PST by Deep_6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deep_6
Maybe, because of these people being held, we have not had another terrorist attack since 9/11.
3 posted on 11/27/2001 5:26:14 AM PST by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy
What about Flight 587 crashing into Rockaway? Is that one going to be covered up just like TWA 800?

g

4 posted on 11/27/2001 5:31:43 AM PST by Geezerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Geezerette
Caused by air turbulance from departing 747.
5 posted on 11/27/2001 5:54:13 AM PST by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Piquaboy
Yeah, right.

g

7 posted on 11/27/2001 7:47:43 AM PST by Geezerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson