[okie01]

"...the internationalist, NWO forces in government and law enforcement will only use this to promote greater co-operation and ties among national and international law enforcement agencies worldwide."

Regardless of who or what is responsible, I gather you believe this would be a bad thing. Why?

[america76]

I don't necessarilly see a little co-operation as such a bad thing, if we could just leave it on an as needed basis. The problem is, the officially binding entanglements and harmonization of laws that will ultimately result in taking such a course.

I don't particularilly welcome the opportunity of other nations to have a hand in writing our laws for us. The world's laws are not going to be brought in line with America's laws; America's laws are more likely to suffer corruption and degredation in the act of being harmonized with the statutes of the rest of the world. This is particularilly distressing to me when I consider the further dammage that would be done to our already shaky second amendment.

I see no need to make any official or binding treaties in this area. A general proclaimitation of the various nation's willingness to co-operate on matters of international law enforcement would surfice. However, I forsee the other option as a greater possibility.